Results 1 to 40 of 54

Thread: Christian Doctors Angry Over "Conscience Rule" Reversal

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think you are severely underestimating the amount of difficulty that is caused for a young person or a poor person who has to travel a hundred miles to get a prescription filled, especially if time is a crucial factor (as it is with emergency contraception). Even then, you are assuming that even if one doctor/pharmacist/etc. refuses to provide service, the patient will automatically know where to go to find someone who won't refuse. One of the things that the "conscience clause" allows health care workers to do is refuse to provide a referral someone who will perform the service. It's not like a patient who is refused service can necessarily just say "Okay fine, I'll just drive over to Dr. Smith in Springville, he'll do it." They may well not have any idea which other doctors/pharmacists/etc. would be willing to provide service, and in a rural area (which tend to be conservative), it's quite likely that they could have a very hard time finding one even if they do spend all day driving around for hours going to all the area's various far-flung pharmacies or doctor's offices or whatever.

  2. #2
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,522
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syme View Post
    I think you are severely underestimating the amount of difficulty that is caused for a young person or a poor person who has to travel a hundred miles to get a prescription filled, especially if time is a crucial factor (as it is with emergency contraception). Even then, you are assuming that even if one doctor/pharmacist/etc. refuses to provide service, the patient will automatically know where to go to find someone who won't refuse. One of the things that the "conscience clause" allows health care workers to do is refuse to provide a referral someone who will perform the service. It's not like a patient who is refused service can necessarily just say "Okay fine, I'll just drive over to Dr. Smith in Springville, he'll do it." They may well not have any idea which other doctors/pharmacists/etc. would be willing to provide service, and in a rural area (which tend to be conservative), it's quite likely that they could have a very hard time finding one even if they do spend all day driving around for hours going to all the area's various far-flung pharmacies or doctor's offices or whatever.
    I was not aware of the referral refusal section of the conscience clause. I think that should be abolished. In fact, I think that referral to someone who will should be mandatory. That seems like a fair compromise that allows doctors to keep their personal integrity while also not inhibiting the rights of those who need the services they won't give.

    I will admit I am kind of baffled by the notion that someone wouldn't be able to find another doctor. There are phone books and phones to call around to find what you need. If I recall correctly, I think you have 24 hours after sex before the morning-after pill is no longer effective. I think that gives people plenty of time to make proper arrangements. Of course, there is the issue that people may be too poor or dumb to do these things, but as I stated before I am not of the belief that policy should cater to the lowest common denominator at the expense of someone else.

  3. #3
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    I was not aware of the referral refusal section of the conscience clause.
    which again I mentioned in my post

    Anyway, the primary consideration here must be that the patient in all cases has access to all legal procedures and medicines that he or she is allowed. The ability for an individual doctor or pharmacist to refuse to perform a certain procedure or dispense a certain medicine should be a secondary concern, period. As MrTroy rightly stated, these are highly regulated professions for good reason; we're not talking about electronics repair people here...
    Last edited by sycld; 04-09-2009 at 11:40 AM.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  4. #4
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,522
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sycld View Post
    which again I mentioned in my post
    Heh, missed that part. I read first two paragraphs then made a post because of them, then forgot to go back and read the rest.

Similar Threads

  1. Can't Spell "Stink" Without "Ink"
    By Cruz_15 in forum Video Vault
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 04:48 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-24-2008, 09:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •