Well, if you had read everything I said you would know that I have already addressed your last paragraph. I don't think people should be denied the opportunity to help people through medicine just because they are find issue in one or two procedures. Contraception is rarely necessary to protect life, and therefore refusing to administer it is not contrary to the Hippocratic oath. Of course doctors shouldn't be allowed to refuse abortions if the mother will die without one, but beyond that I don't see any other contradictions. There is a huge difference between being a doctor who disagrees with contraception and being a euthanizer who disagrees with euthanasia. That is just a silly comparison.

I think the conscience clause can be fixed, and I have outlined how I believe it can be.