Originally Posted by
ollie cromwell
And I find it interesting that *I* get to be nailed on ad hominem, while the OP's post contains numerous examples of implicit ad hom attacks (related to notions of common sense and reason) on previous "nutty Ninth" decisions to ultimately deliver a news report with little conversational value. OP made a pretty posting of a statement of fact with very little to discuss -- either we cheer with the OP and rally against the nutty Ninth, or we sit on our hands and say, "yup, that's how the court decided." There ain't discussion here, just baiting.
Bookmarks