States aren't handling this issue because it's a non-issue. Legislation on things like this is totally unnecessary when the issue isn't brought up to trial. No one is being prosecuted for spanking their child.
And again, you're a states' rights person. But is that only when the states' stances on the issues oppose your own?
Why should something as specific and as intimate as the way parents handle their children be handled at a federal level when such things as marriage and the death penalty are handled at a state level?
Also, do you find the UN convention objectionable? If so, why?
I understand this is a response to Shinysides, and not to me. Nonetheless...
And where is this "right" being threatened to the point that it must be specifically enumerated? There are plenty of rights that aren't so specifically stated, and often times those rights which are stated in the Bill of Rights and elsewhere in the Constitution can and are interpreted broadly enough to cover things like this.
And how does one go about regulating such a "privilege"? Forced sterilization? Forced abortions? Otherwise performing procedures on a person that violates their bodily integrity?
Of course, I agree that children should be taken out of situations in which they are being abused, as they
Bookmarks