Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
Also, I realize that "stuff that affects everyone" vs. "stuff affects only some people" is not the standard by which we determine what is controlled on a federal level vs. what is controlled on a state level, but in my opinion that is what it should be, which is why I don't disagree with this issue being handled federally instead of state-by-state.
Okay, let's say that we do use this criterion to judge what should be treated at a federal level rather than a state level.

In this case, how does abortion affect less people than a "parents' rights" amendment? Don't they affect approximately the same population?