Results 1 to 40 of 94

Thread: Guns on school campuses?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I killed Tupac Shinysides's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,139
    Credits
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous D View Post
    Why do you think K-12 teachers should not carry, but college students should be allowed? Sure there is pretty much no chance of someone shooting up a kindergarten class, but what about all the HS shooting? How do you think Colombine would have turned out if a few teachers were legally carrying guns?
    I think it would have been worse. Armed gunmen in a school is terrifying enough, but a full blown shootout? That would get more people killed. Besides, having a CCW doesn't make you a peace officer. Most people just wouldn't be able to handle a situation like that CCW or no. As I said, better to enforce higher security standards and leave the shootouts to the police. And how many people would one teacher get killed if he had gotten in a gunfight with school shooters? 0? 1? 10? You can't know for sure, but I wouldn't trust most teachers with a gun at school, regardless of a slip of paper telling me it's okay.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    The number of people who get hit by stray bullets during a "shootout" is almost certainly going to be smaller than the number of people who get shot if gunmen are allowed to complete their rampage. The idea that cops are specially capable of handling situations like that, and most people lack that capability, doesn't really have any basis in reality; it's something that people say when they are uncomfortable with the idea of armed citizens and need some reason to disparage it.
    Last edited by Syme; 05-30-2009 at 10:11 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    452
    Credits
    211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syme View Post
    The number of people who get hit by stray bullets during a "shootout" is almost certainly going to be smaller than the number of people who get shot if gunmen are allowed to complete their rampage. The idea that cops are specially capable of handling situations like that, and most people lack that capability, doesn't really have any basis in reality; it's something that people say when they are uncomfortable with the idea of armed citizens and need some reason to disparage it.
    How often do cops get into full blown shootouts in packed areas? I'd imagine most of the time they would do their best to evacuate before risking a gunfight.

    I don't think more guns is the solution. Whilst not causing school shootings etc, they do play a big part in enabling them. Maybe this is just me being cynical, but authorities have had a hell of a time trying to profile would be rampagers, it is a task close to impossible. The idea that doing a class/having a license means you can be trusted with a firearm in public...I know I would be uneasy with this.

    How many school shootings are there in Louisiana? Is it really that common as to merit this? I know people from that part of the world love their guns, but I think this might be taking things too far. I seriously doubt that it would stop school shootings.

    I need to ask...am I the only one who thinks creating a mutual climate of fear is...a slightly disturbing way to do things?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gismo View Post
    How often do cops get into full blown shootouts in packed areas? I'd imagine most of the time they would do their best to evacuate before risking a gunfight.
    They certainly try to, but when someone pulls a gun in a crowded place, cops have to react immediately; they can't clear the area of bystanders first. They don't get to choose when they have a gunfight. Again, the risk of a bystander being hit by a stray bullet is a much less significant one than the risk of allowing a school shooter to go on their rampage until the cops arrive.

    Quote Originally Posted by gismo
    I don't think more guns is the solution. Whilst not causing school shootings etc, they do play a big part in enabling them. Maybe this is just me being cynical, but authorities have had a hell of a time trying to profile would be rampagers, it is a task close to impossible. The idea that doing a class/having a license means you can be trusted with a firearm in public...I know I would be uneasy with this.
    Well, it is already the case that getting a CCH license means you can be trusted with a firearm in public; the system obviously works, because CCHL holders are, statistically speaking, far more law-abiding and safe than the general public. This law would just extend that right, which already exists almost everywhere else, into schools for licensed teachers.

    Quote Originally Posted by gismo
    How many school shootings are there in Louisiana? Is it really that common as to merit this? I know people from that part of the world love their guns, but I think this might be taking things too far. I seriously doubt that it would stop school shootings.
    The This happened in Mississippi in 1997, for what it's worth. Because the particular shooting was brief and the shooter tried to escape, the armed principal stopped him from escaping instead of stopping him during the shooting. The principle is basically the same, though.

    Quote Originally Posted by gismo
    I need to ask...am I the only one who thinks creating a mutual climate of fear is...a slightly disturbing way to do things?
    It's probably a better way of doing things than trying to prevent school shootings by putting up "GUN-FREE ZONE" signs outside schools and then hoping that would-be mass murderers will abandon their plans and go home when they see the signs. And actually, it's not about creating a mutual climate of fear; it's about giving people the ability to respond to an attacker. The hope isn't that school shooters will be dissuaded by fear of an armed teacher, it's that they will be stopped by the actions of an armed teacher. I don't think there is anything disturbing about allowing people to defend themselves and those around them. What's disturbing to me is the attitude that safety is served by creating voluntary-compliance gun restrictions (e.g., the "gun-free zones" that currently exist around schools), which any reasonable person should see will be totally ignored by criminals and will, by definition, only serve to filter out non-criminal gun owners. Current school shooting countermeasures are basically the honor system; we hope that people who are willing to commit murder won't be willing to violate a gun-free school zone ordinance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinysides
    Well, you're welcome to your opinion of course, but as I said in my first post I really don't have an issue with armed citizens, I just don't think schools are the place for it. Also, what about this: Say for example, a teacher is carrying somewhere on his person. What happens if some kid who is just joking around decides to catch said teacher unawares and tries to playfully take it from him? Obviously not a smart move on the kids part, but now we have a potentially lethal situation, for absolutely no reason at all. And if you don't think a highschool kid would do this I beg to differ, I can think of several people off the top of my head who would have likely done such a thing when I was in high school.
    I think "the place for it" is any place where people are at risk of being victimized by violent crime, which sadly includes schools no matter how much we might wish otherwise. As for students grabbing them, the schools should probably require that armed teachers carry their gun in a secure concealed holster, such as an IWB type. We're certainly not talking about open (unconcealed) carry here.
    Last edited by Syme; 05-30-2009 at 01:09 PM.

  5. #5
    I killed Tupac Shinysides's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,139
    Credits
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syme View Post
    The number of people who get hit by stray bullets during a "shootout" is almost certainly going to be smaller than the number of people who get shot if gunmen are allowed to complete their rampage. The idea that cops are specially capable of handling situations like that, and most people lack that capability, doesn't really have any basis in reality; it's something that people say when they are uncomfortable with the idea of armed citizens and need some reason to disparage it.
    Well, you're welcome to your opinion of course, but as I said in my first post I really don't have an issue with armed citizens, I just don't think schools are the place for it. Also, what about this: Say for example, a teacher is carrying somewhere on his person. What happens if some kid who is just joking around decides to catch said teacher unawares and tries to playfully take it from him? Obviously not a smart move on the kids part, but now we have a potentially lethal situation, for absolutely no reason at all. And if you don't think a highschool kid would do this I beg to differ, I can think of several people off the top of my head who would have likely done such a thing when I was in high school.

  6. #6
    FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU Anonymous D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,625
    Credits
    2,766
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinysides View Post
    Well, you're welcome to your opinion of course, but as I said in my first post I really don't have an issue with armed citizens, I just don't think schools are the place for it. Also, what about this: Say for example, a teacher is carrying somewhere on his person. What happens if some kid who is just joking around decides to catch said teacher unawares and tries to playfully take it from him? Obviously not a smart move on the kids part, but now we have a potentially lethal situation, for absolutely no reason at all. And if you don't think a highschool kid would do this I beg to differ, I can think of several people off the top of my head who would have likely done such a thing when I was in high school.
    Im not talking about open carry where everyone can see it. Im talking about CONCEALED carry. And when you CC you dont let anyone know that you have the gun.

    And as far as MORE people getting killed in a shoot out. Noone can say for sure, but IMO, the shooters will concentrate on the ones returning fire in stead of continuing their rampage.

    You say you are all for people carrying guns outside of schools. What are your reasons for that?

    And as far as the gun being taken by some idiot student, there are holsters that actually LOCK the gun in the holster and you have to flip a switch to be able to pull it out.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nermy2k View Post
    roses are red,
    violets are blue,
    deathmaster numbers,
    i'm gonna rape you

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    I had a dream

Similar Threads

  1. Shootin' guns
    By smith357 in forum The Great Outdoors
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-16-2009, 09:49 PM
  2. If you could only have four guns, what would they be?
    By fm2176 in forum The Great Outdoors
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-07-2009, 07:37 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •