View Poll Results: Should marijuana be legalized?

Voters
51. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    14 27.45%
  • Yes but only for medicinal uses

    0 0%
  • Yes for both medicinal and recreational uses.

    37 72.55%
Results 1 to 40 of 88

Thread: Legalizing Mary-Jane Yes or No?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Strangle Hazard thank mr skeltal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Abyss
    Posts
    5,326
    Credits
    7,625
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Ok so you want to start a thread on a serious topic of drug reform, yet you call it "mary-jane" in the thread title, use horrible grammar and spelling (honostley, you do) and use "localwireless.com" as your source?

    In an attempt to save the thread, I'll bite on your topic - the problem with the marijuana legalization movement is because those who most avidly support it are retarded potheads that cannot make a good traditional argument. They come off as stupid potheads and no one pays any attention to them.

    My personal position is that ALL drugs should be legalized, in the sense that they are not illegal to consume or possess. You should have the right to do whatever harm to your body you want as long as it does not endanger others. Now, if the government was smart, they would not only legalize marijuana but assume regulation of production. It is much safer than alcohol, cigarettes, prescription drugs and many more things I'd guess, even safer than caffeine or aspartame. If a kid can buy a diet coke and get two drugs in it that have proven harmful in lab rats, why can't a legal adult buy a joint? Do you know how much marijuana it takes to kill a lab rat? About 20 pounds... dropped on the rat's head. (I didn't make that up, I paraphrased it from something I heard).

  2. #2
    Senior Member John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mulligan's Valley, CO
    Posts
    67
    Credits
    555
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Scarf View Post
    use horrible grammar and spelling (honostley, you do)
    Irony ITT.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Beef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Irving,Tx.
    Posts
    383
    Credits
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Scarf View Post
    Ok so you want to start a thread on a serious topic of drug reform, yet you call it "mary-jane" in the thread title, use horrible grammar and spelling (honostley, you do) and use "localwireless.com" as your source?


    My personal position is that ALL drugs should be legalized, in the sense that they are not illegal to consume or possess. You should have the right to do whatever harm to your body you want as long as it does not endanger others. Now, if the government was smart, they would not only legalize marijuana but assume regulation of production. It is much safer than alcohol, cigarettes, prescription drugs and many more things I'd guess, even safer than caffeine or aspartame. If a kid can buy a diet coke and get two drugs in it that have proven harmful in lab rats, why can't a legal adult buy a joint? Do you know how much marijuana it takes to kill a lab rat? About 20 pounds... dropped on the rat's head. (I didn't make that up, I paraphrased it from something I heard).
    Regardless of my spelling,grammar,or source you yourself should refer to the dictionary and check out the spelling of "honostley" because it's spelled honestly. So HONESTLY~ I can understand how you feel or why you might feel that way.. However a bunch of heroin or pcp addicts biting the eyes out of little children just doesn't fly with me. Yes that's where becoming a danger to others comes in. I understand that an addict in itself is a danger to others (robbing,stealing,mugging,littering AIDS infested needles everywhere). However MARY JANE alone tends not to cause these types of problems. In fact it has had some very important breakthroughs medicinaly in the last 20 years. And although you may be richer (BAHAH!) and more educated than myself I find your response complete JACKASSERY~ but to each their own. I hope you voted.

  4. #4
    I killed Tupac Shinysides's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,139
    Credits
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beef View Post
    Regardless of my spelling,grammar,or source you yourself should refer to the dictionary and check out the spelling of "honostley" because it's spelled honestly. So HONESTLY~ I can understand how you feel or why you might feel that way.. However a bunch of heroin or pcp addicts biting the eyes out of little children just doesn't fly with me. Yes that's where becoming a danger to others comes in. I understand that an addict in itself is a danger to others (robbing,stealing,mugging,littering AIDS infested needles everywhere). However MARY JANE alone tends not to cause these types of problems. In fact it has had some very important breakthroughs medicinaly in the last 20 years. And although you may be richer (BAHAH!) and more educated than myself I find your response complete JACKASSERY~ but to each their own. I hope you voted.
    You sir, are an idiot.

  5. #5
    Leading Seaman sailor jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    On shore leave
    Posts
    2,269
    Credits
    2,504
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beef View Post
    you yourself should refer to the dictionary and check out the spelling of "honostley" because it's spelled honestly. So HONESTLY~
    *chortles quietly*



    this isn't flames, mon ami

    normally i would object but hes banned so he got what he deserved already

    object in flames, or contribute and object there really isn't any other alternative here

    yes sir mr coq sir

    that's better
    Last edited by coqauvin; 09-17-2009 at 09:47 AM.
    YO HO YO HO

    ceci n'est pas une signature

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    121
    Credits
    249
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Scarf View Post
    Now, if the government was smart, they would not only legalize marijuana but assume regulation of production.
    They should regulate it and tax it, if they offered a better deal than drug dealers then that would drive them out of business, or at least reduce their income significantly.

    It would also make it a lot safer, im not sure how it is in the US, but in the UK there was/is a problem with contamination, people adding stuff such as sand, glue and even some reports of lead to increase their profit.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Beef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Irving,Tx.
    Posts
    383
    Credits
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach 5 View Post
    They should regulate it and tax it, if they offered a better deal than drug dealers then that would drive them out of business, or at least reduce their income significantly.

    It would also make it a lot safer, im not sure how it is in the US, but in the UK there was/is a problem with contamination, people adding stuff such as sand, glue and even some reports of lead to increase their profit.
    I do agree with parts of that. Taxing & legalizing marijuana would definately hurt a drug dealer's business in turn making the streets a bit safer. (in theory anyway) However, if everyone picks up a pack of joints to go with their 12 pack of beer our highways are destined to become a graveyard. So recreational use doesn't have my vote as much as medicinally does. I just don't see the downfall for medical marijuana.

  8. #8
    Senior Member ShitFace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,025
    Credits
    3,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beef View Post
    I do agree with parts of that. Taxing & legalizing marijuana would definately hurt a drug dealer's business in turn making the streets a bit safer. (in theory anyway) However, if everyone picks up a pack of joints to go with their 12 pack of beer our highways are destined to become a graveyard. So recreational use doesn't have my vote as much as medicinally does. I just don't see the downfall for medical marijuana.
    ehm lol
    people shouldn't be driving after a 12 pack anyway. if everyone drove after a 12 pack of beer, your highways would be a graveyard anyway.
    Last edited by ShitFace; 09-02-2009 at 07:26 AM.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beef View Post
    I do agree with parts of that. Taxing & legalizing marijuana would definately hurt a drug dealer's business in turn making the streets a bit safer. (in theory anyway) However, if everyone picks up a pack of joints to go with their 12 pack of beer our highways are destined to become a graveyard. So recreational use doesn't have my vote as much as medicinally does.
    Please. I agree that driving while high is dangerous, but it's less dangerous than driving while drunk, and alcohol is already legal for recreational use. So legalizing recreational marijuana use is not going to push us over the brink into some driving-safety nightmare where the highways are graveyards. It's not going to make that much of a difference.

    Quote Originally Posted by UnreasonablyReasonable View Post
    So basically you're saying that the government is artificially altering what succeeds in the market so that things that make less sense end up winning out. This will fix that. Sounds like a pretty good thing that should have happened awhile ago.
    Yes, he's not denying that it's a good thing, he's pointing out the political difficulties that will nevertheless the attend to it due to the substantial size of the industries that legalized marijuana and hemp cultivation would compete with. He's not offering an argument against legalization, he's pointing out an obstacle to legalization. Although I think he's exaggerating. Industrial hemp farming will not "annihilate" other textile products or lumber-derived paper products, for instance; the US is the only country in the world that bans industrial hemp farming, so we can look to other countries for insight on this matter, and see that despite the legality of industrial hemp farming in those countries, non-hemp products have no problem existing in the market along with similar hemp-derived products. The same is true of the pharmaceuticals industry. Marijuana has some interesting applications but it is never going to "annihilate" a large portion of the pharma industry's profits.
    Last edited by Syme; 09-04-2009 at 07:40 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. The Far-Reaching Consequences of Legalizing Marijuana
    By CountFloyd in forum Armchair Intellectuals
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 05:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •