Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 63

Thread: "Abortion addiction"

  1. #1
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default "Abortion addiction"

    I read in this morning's paper about a woman who was "addicted to abortions" and had 17 in 15 years.

    I'm not going to look up this woman or talk about her case, because I want to start off just asking a hypothetical: what do you think should be done in the case of a woman who is addicted to abortions?

    Is it a bad thing?

    Does it warrant intervention from the law?

    If so, how?

  2. #2
    FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU Anonymous D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,625
    Credits
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    The only way I could see something being done about her and people like her would be if abortion were illegal, or there was a limit on how many you could have.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nermy2k View Post
    roses are red,
    violets are blue,
    deathmaster numbers,
    i'm gonna rape you

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    I had a dream

  3. #3
    sponge sponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    sponge
    Posts
    3,788
    Credits
    848
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I mean if I was an insurance company I'd make the copay grow exponentially after maybe procedure 10 per decade but from a moral standpoint if you're ok with one abortion why not be ok with more than one?

    I.e., if the sanctity of life thing doesn't apply to one why does it apply to 15? Disregarding the circumstance of the abortion (last stop birth control for consensual sex or a rape case with an 80 lbs woman whose body would be shattered by a pregnancy).
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    scarf wasn't man enough to do it so queendork pushed herself down the stairs.

  4. #4
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,453
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    I think the law should look into it, but not for a moral issue or anything like that. Anyone who has had 17 abortions in 15 years is probably not the mentally healthiest person, and for the good of herself and the people who may be around her I think the authorities should at least look into it.

  5. #5
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,035
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeah, I really want the government getting involved in preventative mental healthcare *eye roll*

  6. #6
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Mandatory hysterectomy.

    I mean what can you do that isn't either aggressively invasive on the woman's body or doesn't result in an unwanted child being born? It's not as if this is a common problem.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  7. #7
    Sexual Deviant Vengeful Scars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    My Ass
    Posts
    6,588
    Credits
    675
    Trophies
    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    One abortion is fine, one hundred is fine. I think the woman should have her tubes tied, but if she wants to pay the money, and make a doctor rich, that's her prerogative
    lik dis if u cry evertim
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    Oh I was expecting a guide to making meth

  8. #8
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,939
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I know a girl who by 20 has had 5 or 6 abortions. She isn't addicted though, she's just a twat.

    Personally, there's nothing I enjoy more than a good abortion so...live and let die...?

  9. #9
    Scito Te Ipsum TheOriginalGrumpySpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    I am not a citizen of Athens or of Greece but of the world.
    Posts
    4,609
    Credits
    2,228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    what do you think should be done in the case of a woman who is addicted to abortions?
    Nothing

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Is it a bad thing?
    Smoking is pretty terrible and millions are addicted to it.

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Does it warrant intervention from the law?
    No.

    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." -Anne Frank


    “We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.” -Buddha

    Identity


  10. #10
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheOriginalGrumpySpy View Post
    Nothing



    Smoking is pretty terrible and millions are addicted to it.


    No.
    Yes, thank you for gracing us with your opinion, TOGS, but I really was hoping for answers more like this:

    Quote Originally Posted by sponge View Post
    I mean if I was an insurance company I'd make the copay grow exponentially after maybe procedure 10 per decade but from a moral standpoint if you're ok with one abortion why not be ok with more than one?

    I.e., if the sanctity of life thing doesn't apply to one why does it apply to 15?
    Well, basically. (I actually expected more argument itt than this.)

  11. #11
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Well, gwahir, people who are fat and smoke are more of a burden collectively on a healthcare system than this one woman.

    I wouldn't be surprised if individually at least some of them were more of a burden on a healthcare system.

    Yeah, this woman is an idiot, and even I have to question to ethics of getting chain abortions just for the fun of it. Still, shit happens, no system is perfect, and sometimes wierdos do weird things. Eh.
    Last edited by sycld; 10-15-2009 at 08:37 PM.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  12. #12
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sycld View Post
    Yeah, this woman is an idiot, and even I have to question to ethics of getting chain abortions just for the fun of it..
    AH HAH.

    Here's what I want to talk about.

    Why?

  13. #13
    Senior Member Absolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,851
    Credits
    446
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Let her do what she wants with her body and money. It would be weird though if she had a husband and kids and the husband goes along with this; how do you pick which live and which don't? Or does she try to get pregnant just to get the abortion in that specific moment? There really isn't much to discuss other than that it's weird...

    and that the rest of society would crucify this woman given the chance.

  14. #14
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Because even though I support available and legal abortion, I still think there are both practical and ethical issues with it that at least should be given a bit of consideration.

    No, I don't think there is an invisible being that infuses zygotes with souls. On the other hand, there is simply no clear cut time when a fetus becomes viable and thus has personhood ascribed to them. If anything, I think one could make a valid argument to the effect that babies are themselves not viable after birth up to a certain age Indeed, some people have made this argument in favor of legal infanticide, and infanticide used to be a regular practice when humans felt as though they didn't have the resources to support their children. (Yeah infanticide is practiced in modern times mostly on unwanted girls, but so is selective abortion of girls as well.)

    Also, with the development of more and more advanced neonatal technologies, viability is likewise increased in earlier and earlier in the pregnancy. So are you telling me that when a fetus is a human is dependent on the state of our technology? Well, according to Roe vs. Wade, at least legally it is what determines if the fetus can be aborted or not.

    At any rate, the argument in the above paragraph only address a very small fraction of abortions, as those that late in the pregnancy are rare, and neonatologists think that there is a hard limit of 22 weeks when a pre-term baby can survive at all (obviously, there has to be some hard limit). However, what if there is developed an artificial womb-like environment external to the mother's womb that pushes viability even earlier? For now it is a hypothetical argument and thus its applicability to the current abortion debate is dubious at best, but still I think it's at least an interesting scenario to consider.

    Another concern is with regards to abortions used to be that they might have a psychological toll on some women, but a review of studies on women that have one abortion seems to conclude that they are methodologically unsound, as they do not adequately control for other sources of psychological trauma (such as poverty, abuse, etc.) There might be some evidence that multiple abortions might be psychologically more trying on women, but that's the strongest statement I've read on this.



    These are just a couple of the issues surrounding abortion that I think do surround the abortion debate. In the end, you are arresting the development of something that will eventually become a thing we recognize as a human, and it really is a gradual development from zygote to baby with no real clear cut off between phases. I have to admit that mostly I'm playing the devil's advocate here, as again I am in support of safe, available, and legal abortion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Absolution View Post
    Let her do what she wants with her body and money.
    That's the thing, though. It's not her money. She is an Australian spending the taxpayer's money for her abortions.
    Last edited by sycld; 10-15-2009 at 11:56 PM.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  15. #15
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    I'm curious as to why viability is such a big issue in the abortion debate. What's the ethical difference between a viable and unviable foetus? If there's no being that infuses unborn babies with souls, and it's okay to end the life of a foetus that technology cannot support, it should be okay to end the life of one it can support.

    Viability is no better a cutoff point than conception, I think.

  16. #16
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,035
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    The beginning of life is a culturally-defined point in time, not a medical one.

    And, more importantly, gwahir didn't mention anything about her using taxpayer money. If she's financing this irresponsible behavior with taxpayer dollars, then they ought to take her out back and shoot her. Public money shouldn't be funding any medical treatment, much less elective procedures.

  17. #17
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    I'm curious as to why viability is such a big issue in the abortion debate. What's the ethical difference between a viable and unviable foetus? If there's no being that infuses unborn babies with souls, and it's okay to end the life of a foetus that technology cannot support, it should be okay to end the life of one it can support.

    Viability is no better a cutoff point than conception, I think.
    Well, in the US, there was legal significance attached to the idea of viability thanks to Roe vs. Wade.

    So then where is the cut-off? If a baby is about to be born, is it still abortable as long as it's in the womb? If that's the case, then why shouldn't infanticide of newborns be legal?

    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    And, more importantly, gwahir didn't mention anything about her using taxpayer money. If she's financing this irresponsible behavior with taxpayer dollars, then they ought to take her out back and shoot her. Public money shouldn't be funding any medical treatment, much less elective procedures.
    Well, given that gwahir is from Australia, I assumed the woman was getting abortions with their socialized healthcare system. Apparently, she's actually American, that's not really applicable here.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  18. #18
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Neither babies nor foetuses are people, in any useful meaning of the word. The only physical/intrinsic difference between them is that one's in a box and the other isn't.

    Infanticide is different to abortion -- that is, infants are different to foetuses -- in one morally relevant way: when it's born, people in the world form attachments to it. From legal, societal attachments (like giving it a name, or status as a "person" by law) to loving, familiar attachments. In short... foetuses are different to babies because people like babies better.

    Quote Originally Posted by sycld View Post
    Well, given that gwahir is from Australia, I assumed the woman was getting abortions with their socialized healthcare system. Apparently, she's actually American, that's not really applicable here.
    I did say we're not talking about any case in particular. This is removing it from healthcare and insurance and all that mundane crap that belongs elsewhere.

  19. #19
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Infanticide is different to abortion -- that is, infants are different to foetuses -- in one morally relevant way: when it's born, people in the world form attachments to it. From legal, societal attachments (like giving it a name, or status as a "person" by law) to loving, familiar attachments. In short... foetuses are different to babies because people like babies better.
    Just as a point of reference, when youth mortality rates were higher (up to mid-eighteenth century in england, for example), parents would rarely name their children until they were several years of age, because, well, a lot of them died.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Absolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,851
    Credits
    446
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coqauvin View Post
    Just as a point of reference, when youth mortality rates were higher (up to mid-eighteenth century in england, for example), parents would rarely name their children until they were several years of age, because, well, a lot of them died.
    You're making it sound like for seven years they just acknowledged the child as "boy".

    Back on topic - Any addiction is unhealthy, especially this one because let's face it, it isn't normal; drug addiction is understandable but what reward could anyone possibly gain from getting intentional abortions? I'm not sure what punishment if any would be appropriate for this specific woman, but fifteen is a ridiculous number.
    Last edited by Absolution; 10-16-2009 at 12:12 PM.

  21. #21
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    No, they just wouldn't name infants or toddlers.

  22. #22
    the common sense fairy solecistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    2,078
    Credits
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I kind of think of it the way I'd think of killing pets. If you can't take care of your pet, you can send it to the SPCA, where if no one else can take care of your pet, it will be humanely euthanized. We think of it as wrong to torture animals, of course, but we don't really tend to think of it as morally reprehensible to end the life of a dog or cat that is unwanted/unloved/unable to be taken care of. In fact, it's considered sad but responsible. That said, if I found out someone was getting their dog pregnant just to crush the skulls of the puppies over and over, I'd find that a little bit fucked up, you know? Even if it's not "murder." Because it is creating life for the sole purpose of ending that life. And I think we might instinctively feel like that's wrong because it goes against our biological imperatives.

    Getting an abortion because the pregnancy was a mistake is one thing, because it shows something more like responsibility to make a decision about the consequences of carrying to term. But getting pregnant just to abort? I think abortion should be legal, but that doesn't mean I think getting an abortion is the same thing as getting a mole removed. It's not, or there wouldn't be such a debate.

  23. #23
    sponge sponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    sponge
    Posts
    3,788
    Credits
    848
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Well, basically. (I actually expected more argument itt than this.)
    sponge is right, thread over.

    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    And, more importantly, gwahir didn't mention anything about her using taxpayer money. If she's financing this irresponsible behavior with taxpayer dollars, then they ought to take her out back and shoot her. Public money shouldn't be funding any medical treatment, much less elective procedures.
    On the flip side the 15 or whatever children would have been far larger burdens on the public coffers had they been born and supported by the state until age 18 (longer if you consider the need-based financial aid they'd almost certainly qualify for if they were to go for higher ed).

    There is a happy median here, get x free abortions in y years and you get to pay your own way until you drop below your quota again with the option of a state-funded sterilization.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    scarf wasn't man enough to do it so queendork pushed herself down the stairs.

  24. #24
    kiss my sweaty balls benzss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,455
    Credits
    43,782
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Either you have abortion rights or you don't. Having some kind of quota per person is pretty retarded.
    well i mean

    Quote Originally Posted by Mang View Post
    I need to see a girl getting penetrated in 4 orifices

  25. #25
    λεγιων ονομα μοι sycld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    10,570
    Credits
    2,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benzss View Post
    Either you have abortion rights or you don't. Having some kind of quota per person is pretty retarded.
    yeah i agree.

    but ethical considerations aside, when it comes down to it the more that individuals use health insurance in countries with private healthcare or use subsidized healthcare in countries with subsidized care, the more expensive healthcare is for everyone.

    but it's not like abortion addiction is that common anyway so this one woman's practice makes little difference. it's the fatties and smokers that do.


    PANDAS
    If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Think View Post
    Atheists are quite right

  26. #26
    sponge sponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    sponge
    Posts
    3,788
    Credits
    848
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benzss View Post
    Either you have abortion rights or you don't. Having some kind of quota per person is pretty retarded.
    My proposed quota is in regards to how many taxpayers will pay for, not how many you're legally allowed to get.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    scarf wasn't man enough to do it so queendork pushed herself down the stairs.

  27. #27
    kiss my sweaty balls benzss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,455
    Credits
    43,782
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Well, abortion is an elective procedure most of the time anyway. So there's no reason whatsoever for a taxpayer to fund it.
    well i mean

    Quote Originally Posted by Mang View Post
    I need to see a girl getting penetrated in 4 orifices

  28. #28
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,939
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by benzss View Post
    Well, abortion is an elective procedure most of the time anyway. So there's no reason whatsoever for a taxpayer to fund it.
    If the birth/raising/existence of that child would be a bigger burden on the taxpayer then there is every reason to fund it.

  29. #29
    kiss my sweaty balls benzss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,455
    Credits
    43,782
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simonj View Post
    If the birth/raising/existence of that child would be a bigger burden on the taxpayer then there is every reason to fund it.
    True. Then again if conceiving/aborting a child would be a bigger burden on the taxpayer, then there's every reason to sterilise those who don't meet certain sensibility requirements.
    well i mean

    Quote Originally Posted by Mang View Post
    I need to see a girl getting penetrated in 4 orifices

  30. #30
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,939
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    You could argue that way but you're moving towards a fascist society with that logic. Simply offsetting unneccessary births by funding abortions is not quite as socially damaging as mild eugenics.

  31. #31
    kiss my sweaty balls benzss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,455
    Credits
    43,782
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simonj View Post
    You could argue that way but you're moving towards a fascist society with that logic. Simply offsetting unneccessary births by funding abortions is not quite as socially damaging as mild eugenics.
    Good thing it's your logic and not mine then, heh.

    But I digress. Abortion is an elective procedure because, more often than not, it's the consequence of a freely taken lifestyle choice. And I'm not sure anybody should fund anybody else's lifestyle choices - children (or lack thereof) included.

    If you insist on universal/socialised healthcare (ugh) then it should at the very least be universal (in addition to being rubbish) but only for non-elective and emergency procedures. Having elective and other unnecessary procedures paid for surely devalues the entire point of affordable healthcare by kicking up its cost p/person, no?
    Last edited by benzss; 10-18-2009 at 12:18 PM.
    well i mean

    Quote Originally Posted by Mang View Post
    I need to see a girl getting penetrated in 4 orifices

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    62
    Credits
    490
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    What about mandatory sterilization after a certain point. I don't find it to be that the government would be stepping in on this case, because if you did not want to be sterilized, you could just not have an abortion.

  33. #33
    the common sense fairy solecistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    2,078
    Credits
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ocelot22 View Post
    What about mandatory sterilization after a certain point. I don't find it to be that the government would be stepping in on this case, because if you did not want to be sterilized, you could just not have an abortion.
    ...

    Really?

  34. #34
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ocelot22 View Post
    What about mandatory sterilization after a certain point. I don't find it to be that the government would be stepping in on this case, because if you did not want to be sterilized, you could just not have an abortion.
    Brilliant! You should write your congressman immediately to share this idea.

  35. #35
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,939
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think he should volunteer for the medical trials to test the aforementioned sterilizations.

  36. #36
    the common sense fairy solecistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    2,078
    Credits
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    like fuck that shit is so ridiculous that now i'm laffin

    HEY LADIES BETTER CARRY THAT BABY TO TERM OR ELSE WE PLUG UP YOUR UTERUS FOREVER

    you know...actually, it's a pretty kickass idea

  37. #37
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,939
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    "I'm going to plug up your uterus forever" sounds like really disgusting dirty talk.

  38. #38
    the eagle
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,334
    Credits
    860
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Oh baby, my shaft is going to rock your fallopian tubes ohhhh baby

  39. #39
    the common sense fairy solecistic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    2,078
    Credits
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    mmm put ur penile instrument up near my ovarian love trap mmmm

  40. #40
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    ah, the ovarian love trap: millions enter, but only one leaves

    where is ebay's listings for uteran corks because there are some i just want to take care of as a favour to society

Similar Threads

  1. Can't Spell "Stink" Without "Ink"
    By Cruz_15 in forum Video Vault
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-05-2009, 04:48 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-24-2008, 09:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •