Thread: Atheists

I'm sorry if I offended you and it certainly wasn't my intent to try to appear superior to you or Atheists in general.

This is my argument:

1) God is an unfalisfiable concept.
2) Therefore god is unscientific.
3) Therefore belief systems that involve god are unscientific.

However, science isn't everything. Art for the most part is unscientific, yet it still has merit. Theism and Atheism both have their merits, however neither are for me. I like science. I like to think that I am a logic oriented person. For me, the most logical and scientific answer as to whether a god exists or not is "I don't know now and I may never know ever". I personally find believing in god and not believing in god both illogical to different degrees.

Originally Posted by KT.

However, science isn't everything. Art for the most part is unscientific, yet it still has merit.

Basically, "I know that c1 and c2 exclude too much, but I wouldn't like to say precisely why"
again, this is not a matter of science, it's a matter of philosophy: What constitutes valid evidence for something, and what constitutes reason? Whether that's only science or whether there are more hermeneutics for grasping the world is a strictly philosophical concern.