Thread: I hope this is an appropriate first post.

Originally Posted by TheOriginalGrumpySpy

I still find it odd that people on the supreme court can't view the constitution as a LIVING document.

what are you talking about the framers of the constitution clearly had the foresight to predict such as things as the internet and modern medical technology down the line and wrote it for a nation in which all people had equal rights and not one in which half the white population and most of the non-white population was completely disenfranchised

i mean god togs wtf are you talking about

Originally Posted by sycld

what are you talking about the framers of the constitution clearly had the foresight to predict such as things as the internet and modern medical technology down the line and wrote it for a nation in which all people had equal rights and not one in which half the white population and most of the non-white population was completely disenfranchised

i mean god togs wtf are you talking about

if they wanted the constitution to be a living document they would have added the possibility of amendments

Originally Posted by jack burden

if they wanted the constitution to be a living document they would have added the possibility of amendments

yes because every time technology or the world change we make an amendment to reflect this change cause all congress does is make constitutional amendments all day

where are the amendments on digital property and sex change surgery