i mean coq and infernus would've had to accuse eachother atleast once in the game in a not so serious fashion so that we can't link cooperation between all three mafia members (i believe they did, but likely not with this purpose) , and then inventing a sheriff pm after he/she dies so that it could grant them both inmunity, which would work cause there would be no way of confirming it's valid. oh and KT could've just played it safe. it seems far fetched
then theres the x/coq/simonj theory
simonj initially stated coq was innocent, and could be considered as support to a mafia member, but at that time the game was actually just getting started, and there was no solid proof that even hinted coq as a mafia member
the day that think got lynched simonj voted to flush think, maybe it was so that the third mafia member could remain hidden and a tie could be forced. the best that could happen? think gets lynched because of a coin toss and coq lives to kill again, which luckily happened, it was the best that could be done without being too obvious about saving coq from a lynching.
then coq "accepted" defeat, theres a chance he pointed out an innocent player and a mafia member (snead and simonj respectively) in that post, so that we all thought "lol terrible bluff they are both innocent" and would lead us to think atmosfear and someone else (infernus?) are both mafia members.
so it's a far fetched theory, againts a somewhat possible one. still, i'll give this aditional thought, even though it seems like "go with the simplest explanation" kind of thing
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks