how about mutton pressuring me with a logical fallacy, but not committing an actual vote to it?
how about mutton pressuring me with a logical fallacy, but not committing an actual vote to it?
Originally Posted by Nermy2k
Lol, Christ almighty... the second page is crazy.
PANDAS
If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.
it is very intense, I am not going to lie, I didn't read the majority of it
These games seem to have become pretty damn serious since I last played them. Think, you seem to be exhorting volumes of fallacious reasoning as far as I can tell. So seeing as voting against posters due to misdemeanors in previous games seems to be acceptable and in the interest of reducing the amount of bullshit I will for now, at least /delete think
something's not getting through here
I never thought you were likely to be mafia
everyone should re-read this thread and try to see it from coq's point of view and from my point of view (especially Think, who is overthinking as usual)
i think sponge, Rick Scarf, and WellAdjusted are town
think is a-ok with me because he acknowledged that he talks too much in an earlier thread
I don't know. Think is a pretty strong town player. He's helped figure out mafia and shit and other bad stuff before.
Sounds like something a mafia would say
lol
you're... you're right
well then /delete rick scarf because i'm sure this is some retardedly elaborate ruse to get me a new loveseat
I lol'd
Dammit I meant to quote Thinks post from the last page.
Thanks fgujgfu! I've been looking for some cheap uggs and cheap nfl jerseys!
delete simonj fuck you I'm not clicking that
undelete coq, delete sponge only malware would be looking for cheap uggs online
Damn niggers, I'm about ready to get this day over, about to start saying no deletion.
lik dis if u cry evertim
Hi guys, here's a votecount before I leave for the day:
(Listed in order of most votes to fewest. Players who voted for listed in italics, in alphabetical order.)
Slight Rule Change:
I'll give it until the end of the day (Friday, Midnight EST) and then I'm going to reduce the majority 7 votes required to a plurality 6 votes. This day is starting to get bogged down and votes are switching away from having any chance of getting a majority.
(Here's a hint: No one is going to slip and reveal he is mafia with one random vote against him, yet there are 8 of 12 players with votes against them. And this puts you no closer to the Night phase.)
wat
it was simonj, not sponge
bitches don't know shit delete kt
Well... does there have to be a lynchin' everyday?
If the townspeople are each day too divided to get someone lynched, then maybe the clock should just run out on them. It'll teach us not to be so indecisive in the future, that's for sure.
Of course, I personally am of the opinion that a lynch on the first day is not necessarily in the innocents' favor...
PANDAS
If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.
undelete sponge, delete simonj
It's better to lynch on the first day, so we can gain information about the Virus voting patterns.
oops, meant to delete Rick Scarf
Atmosfear, you had simonj voting twice in your last chart. The actual vote count was correct though.
fixed and updated voting chart
undelete welladjusted and delete kt for being a flip flopper
Yeah, fuck that method of vote tracking. I'm setting up my spreadsheet to preformat it now and save me the hassle of trying to copy-pasta an old chart and update it manually.
undelete simonj delete KT
getting on the bandwagon so we can lynch someone finally
questions:
KT: why move your vote off coq to whoever happens to have the same number of votes (simonj, then Rick Scarf)?
coq: explain your vote for Rick Scarf
Atmosfear: has Woofness received a warning for not posting every day? btw, my table for vote tracking in Brit or Shit was easy to update
WellAdjusted: why join these games if you're just going to vote randomly and not pay attention? it drags down whichever team you are on
everyone: who is most likely to get night killed? who are good candidates for night investigation?
there are some relationships that we can try to infer, which the sheriff and nurse can use
for example, this post makes it unlikely that sponge and Think are both mafia (all this means is that if we find sponge to be mafia, then Think gets cleared as town, and vice versa)
similarly, the fight between coq and scyld right at the start of the game makes it unlikely both of them are mafia
in conclusion, /delete KT
lol well i mean, sponge has changed his vote as many times as I have
pretty much this. Everyone was leaving the "coq bandwagon".
This is the current votecount:
Unless the game is stalling mindlessly, I disagree. A nolynch should reflect the will of the town, and shouldn't be a weapon the mafia can use to their advantage.
Worst case scenario, we would use mutton's method of plurality with a time limit, not a default nolynch.
Yes. Keep in mind that Woofness is a brit, so he is on a different posting schedule. For what its worth, he hasn't responded to my PM.
My table is easy to update, the challenge was that I was copy-pasting an old one and editing it every time i posted the votes, so copied data was making it into the post. Now Excel formats it for me automatically and there's no risk of error
woof
I have been here all along, but there seems to have been little development worth commenting on.
Oddly enough think I agree with syclds last point.
This day is dragging somewhat regardless of what side of the Atlantic you're on.
For the record I'm currently suspicious of Mutton. His posts echo when we were mafia in the first game more than they do his posts in any other game. I'm not going to switch my vote at this point though.
well thanks for letting us know
woof
mutton: it was a random vote, why do you think i said it's a retardedly elaborate ruse to buy a loveseat
atmosfear: can we not do the 'most votes gets lynched at time limit' and do a 'no lynch if majority isn't reached by time limit?' In Brit-or-Shit, there was a tie between me and think and think ended up getting lynched with 2 votes out of 11 players. That's fucking stupid.
in other news, i'm finding KT.'s strategy of 'keep quiet and switch votes to the latest bandwagon' to be scummy play.
Yes coq lets make up the rules as we go along instead of sticking to the original rules. This isn't the first time we've played this here.
Also who cares who KT votes for, this is the first day. It doesn't really matter who gets kicked off the island at this point, we just need to pick someone
^^ this is called terrible play
there is plenty to comment on
your quietness is the most suspicious thing so far
a random vote is more scummy than a bandwagon vote; the former achieves nothing, the latter avoids a no-lynch and pressures the target
list these games
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks