That is disgusting.. that article
That is disgusting.. that article
Also I am claiming next game after KT.
unless the two players voting for each other are both town, in which case the mafia always winsOriginally Posted by atmosfear
And yes, when it reaches 1 mafia, 2 town, it is a 50-50 outcome. Because the town cannot tie and no lynch, and a player cannot vote for himself, it always amounts to two players voting for eachother and the third breaking the tie.
so it's still 66% for mafia in this case
Or the two town can vote first, both for the mafia. Still 50/50.
Also with 2/7 there is no chance for a nolynch (town should nolynch at 1/3, 2/4, and 3/5, but none occurs.)
mafia wins 4 of 6Code:voter 6 cases of who they vote for M T1 T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 M M M T2 T2 T2 T2 M M T1 T1 M T1
You might be right.
My thought was that, because the game ends immediately if the first vote is wrong, it really only matters what the first person does. I also made the assumption that the mafia wouldn't want to act first, but that's more of a generalization about mafia play than it is anything truly random.
I imagine in reality, the number is closer to 50-50, but since this was supposedly based on pure probability, you're right. The numbers should be more like 63% mafia-favored.
I have three midterms tomorrow, and I keep looking back here for a mafia game or something to get my mind off of stress... but there is nothing
since the other mafia thread is closed right now, I'm going to bitch here about Think not logging in for 3 days.
DAMN YOU THINK I WANT TO PLAY MAFIA
FUCKING LOG IN AND CONFIRM
I hope he didn't die. That would be a great loss for Wales.
I recently discovered that, yes, mountainous games tend to favour mafia over town by a roughly 40/60% odds. But that's only for random lynches.
blah blah blah redundant information
Coqauvin the other piece of that is the smaller the player pool, the more the outcomes represent random votes, even with power roles. The less time the town has to gather information, the more the outcomes skew toward random.
time is in no way dependant on the number of players in terms of how it impacts the game. The overall length is longer if there are more players because there are more people to sift through, but in terms of actually finding the mafia, time is irrelevant. Days last as long as they need to.
let's go I wanna lynch some nuckas
Who plays completely randomly?
no one, but in order to model things easily, one sometimes has to simplify things and then keep in mind the simplifications when considering deviations between the model and real life.
if that's not a good enough answer,
then your mom. your mom does.
PANDAS
If you don't like them, then get the fuck out.
my mom doesn't :'(
coq's mom is dead
so is hitler
coincidence?
hitler isn't dead
I do you dumb bitch
Calling shenanagins on this one
also welladjusted come stay with me we'll have some parties oh yeah
p.s. no you can't actually stay with me don't be silly
For paradise among this world
Is finding love in boy and girl
zing
Oh bro you caught me.
But hey, look, you're not dead.
Time is completely dependent. If you have a threat of losing on day 3, the town is afforded far less room for error. A single wrong assumption can doom the town to effectively random votes.
Room for error is not related to time.
Time is not related to realtime
look you can take a full week of realtime getting a lynch on day 1. In that time, there will be a host of connections made just from people arguing with each other. If you miss, certain information is solidified and some is rendered null. Regardless, time's only impact on the game is roughly: the less time you spend hunting mafia, the more likely the mafia are to win.
when you say 'time' i assume 'realtime' not 'game turns'
you say 'party' we say 'die'
fucking shit, can we start the new game or what?
Can we still party?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks