A DOUBLE RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAINBOW
waaahomgitssobeautiful
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI
Printable View
A DOUBLE RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAINBOW
waaahomgitssobeautiful
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQSNhk5ICTI
STHPECTACULAR
WHOA
The Gregory Bros. got their paws on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0D4oZwCsA
Is that guy jerkin off to a double rainbow?
I saw a double rainbow the other day and all I did was take a picture.
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s...00626-2006.jpg
KT I believe it was double rainbow as in "Holy shit, I can see a full 180 degree Rainbow, all in front of me, making a perfect semi-circle" double rainbow, and not a, "Oh kewl, I can see two exact rainbows" double rainbow.
i saw such a strong, clear rainbow in the hills of scotland the other day after rain that i could quite clearly see where it "hit" the ground
i mean of course it doesn't hit the ground but i had never seen the connection before like it was always behind a hill or a post office or something
I like how the guy says it's almost a triple rainbow. Triple rainbows don't exist in nature. What an idiot.
Wrong.
don't fuck with me I know all about them rainbowsQuote:
Since a fraction of light always undergoes additional internal reflection instead of re-entering the air, a single drop of water is theoretically capable of giving an infinite number of rainbows. But the higher the order, the fainter the rainbow. Now, rainbows up to k=13 (i.e. with light reflecting 13 times inside the drop before re-entering the air) have been observed from a single drop of water suspended from the end of a wire in the lab. And rainbows up to k=19 have been observed in thin, falling streams of water, again in the lab.
But the rainbows with k=3 and beyond are observed only in lab. To my knowledge they have never been observed outdoors. Here's why:
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your. But the third (k=3) and fourth (k=4) rainbows are formed behind your back, the fourth just above the third. You'll never see them, as they are much fainter than the first two, and you'd have to look in the direction of the Sun, where a glare from the sunlight will make an observation impossible.
http://www.jal.cc.il.us/~mikolajsawicki/ex_optics.html
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s...rn-rainbow.jpg
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
You'd see the primary and secondary rainbow only if the Sun is behind your.
this thread is pretty gay tbh
kt you are wrong for the following reason:
you are teh ghey
no but 4 rlsies u r wong
guys i have seen a quadruple rainbow i'm pretty sure that makes me jesus
if this isn't an actual photographic evidence of a triple rainbow then gwahir can SUCK MY COCK
WHOA THAT'S A FULL [TRIPLE] RAINBOW
some good gameplay video of diablo 3(how late am i on this)
lol how high is that guy?
i want some of what he was smoking.
batman
Just to complete the saga of the double rainbow,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2FiiMWNHU