Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 61

Thread: Whopper Virgins

  1. #1
    Senior Member Absolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,851
    Credits
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default Whopper Virgins

    Some of you have probably seen this advertised on tv, and people are making a big fuss over the "ethics" of this advertising campaign. The whole schpeel is researchers go to remote parts of the world where the natives have never seen/eaten/heard of a hamburger; and are given a choice between a big mac and whopper.

    The only thing that can be concluded is that Burger King's ad depot. is light years ahead of McDonald's (which consist of black people and i'm lovin it).

  2. #2
    Senior Member pringles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    105
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Burger King is trying to take over the world by making everyone obese with their delicious burgers

  3. #3
    Sexual Deviant Vengeful Scars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    My Ass
    Posts
    6,588
    Credits
    667
    Trophies
    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    OBESITY: A global threat emerges
    lik dis if u cry evertim
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    Oh I was expecting a guide to making meth

  4. #4
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,444
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Every girl who hasn't had sex with my is a whopper virgin, huhu

  5. #5
    Scito Te Ipsum TheOriginalGrumpySpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    I am not a citizen of Athens or of Greece but of the world.
    Posts
    4,609
    Credits
    2,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    What they don't show is the whopper virgins crying, regretting what they've done with the wrong burger at the wrong time, and then vomiting because they couldn't handle the guilt/disgusting burger.

  6. #6
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    TOGS they don't show the pain or confusion of those who had a whopper forced on them as a child, either. These people need our help.

  7. #7
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think this is the most fucked up thing ever. We haul in some of the poorest people in the world, gawk at them for the advertisement of a corporate giant and then send them back into the god forsaken backwater village they came from? I mean WTF?! Maybe if BK helped them by getting the clean water or something instead of just givin' them a free burger.
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  8. #8
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,444
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Why would anyone expect Burger King to turn into a humanitarian organization? I think the experiment is interesting. Most of those primitive tribes are that way because they want to be (if what I've learned from National Geographic specials has taught me anything). There is no ethical problem here that I see.

  9. #9
    Superfly Pepsi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Somewhere in your pants.
    Posts
    7,906
    Credits
    846
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Burger King will now be joining up with PETA to calm down the fusses about ethics.
    I hear the voices inside my head. They counsel me. They understand. They talk to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by djwolford View Post
    You know, when Tidus points out that you have failed at internetting, it's probably time to go ahead and off yourself.
    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    pepsi reserves the right to tell cryptic to get out at any time

    it's in the CD charter

  10. #10
    Senior Member pinkeyedjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    38
    Credits
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Here's what I don't get... why is someone who's never had a burger before somehow better at judging a burger than me?

    I know my goddamned burgers.

  11. #11
    Senior Member BonzoJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    4
    Credits
    359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    The few remaining uncommercialised areas of the world and they just have to shove burgers in their face.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Absolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,851
    Credits
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    They both taste like shit.

  13. #13
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    My issue with this campaign has nothing to do with ethics.

    My issue is that the assumption that the tastes of some backwater villagers 3000 miles away who have never eaten the food before and are utterly unacquainted to my dietary preferences or needs are supposedly capable of indicating which would be preferable to me.

    More than anything I hate companies who refuse to adapt their marketing to recognize that mass advertising through screens is dead in today's society and the only way to retain attention is through experience.

  14. #14
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    (I am one of the economists who opposes advertising though so)

  15. #15
    God That Smelled Good linkinkampf19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    315
    Credits
    315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Granted, both McD's and BK are shitty burgers (okay, I get them in a rush), but how do we know these "whopper virgins" are really what they say? I highly doubt they are really natives who have never had a burger, or for that matter, cooked meat. Look at me, I'm already over-analyzing a stupid commercial... TV sucks.

  16. #16
    nudie poppin' knockin' Pepè Silvia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    due South
    Posts
    156
    Credits
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    In before burger pussy.

  17. #17
    beautiful dirty rich Nadia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,278
    Credits
    359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I just came back from Burger King, it was pretty good except the milkshake machine wasn't working. It never freaking works .
    Quote Originally Posted by sycld View Post
    Nadia.... I'm gonna rep you so fucking hard.
    http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5...d/nadiaqs3.jpg

  18. #18
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    (I am one of the economists who opposes advertising though so)
    Oppose advertising? Isn't that like, one of the biggest budgeted areas in marketing? How could you wanna stop that?
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  19. #19
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,444
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Advertising is vital for monopolistic competition to keep going, and since the vast majority of things in America are sold this way we probably want to let it keep going.

  20. #20
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    Advertising is vital for monopolistic competition to keep going, and since the vast majority of things in America are sold this way we probably want to let it keep going.
    Thats what I thought. This was like the very first time I had ever heard someone opposed to it. I found it really interesting. Plus, I mean, even the mom and pop stores advertise. Not commercially but through the newspapers. I used to work for a local paper and our distribution budget was made up through local shops.
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  21. #21
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    well here is another thread derailed.

    First, economically speaking, any argument for advertising tends to be reinforcing the status quo and the impracticality of eliminating it from the market. I understand this, and I understand it will never go away. It's a prisoner's dilemma, so firms have no choice but to advertise because it is possible.

    Second, realize that there are some benefits to advertising that are both more cost-effective and non-unique to mass advertising. Advertising is an effective means of differentiating products and establishing a brand; you know that a bottle with a red label and the white Coca-Cola script is going to taste like coke. Second, advertising is an effective way of conveying facts of the products (again, look on the bottle and know the nutrition facts.) These are important to consumers, but both of these examples were realized without mass advertising. I'm not advocating that every product needs to be devoid of labeling or aesthetic appeal.

    Third, advertising is, by its very nature, either unnecessary for consumers or misleading. Take a hypothetical situation in which there are two vacuum cleaners, A and B. Brand A is top-quality, a great value, and works perfectly. To improve sales, they pour millions of dollars into advertising for their product. Brand B is low-quality, a poor value, and does not work as advertised. To improve sales, they pour millions of dollars into advertising for their product.

    A month later, both products are reporting great sales figures; the advertising is working. Two months later, product A is still going strong and B is leveling off. By the end of three months, product A is established in the marketplace and product B is putting even more money into advertising to help their sales numbers. By the six month period, product A has cut its advertising budget in half and its sales are strong. Product B has disappeared.

    This is exactly as the free market would have the situation play out. The inferior product is gone from the marketplace. However, what about all those consumers who received advertising for B and purchased B, only to wind up with an inferior product? What about all the money that Firm B made on the sales of their inferior product, driven not by the product itself but by good advertising? I would say it's unethical, but I understand why they do it. The free market is still successful, but not because of advertising, rather in spite of advertising.

    Advertising also has a couple of other effects on a product: as my example illustrates, it doesn't really improve sales or profitability for any product in the long-run (in order to continue driving sales numbers, remember, product B had to increase its advertising.) Advertising is, by nature, associated with quality. The logic of the consumer is "if the product wasn't good, the company wouldn't waste the money to advertise." The act of advertising at all is a sign of quality to the consumer (compare: would you be more likely to purchase a product that you first heard about from an advertisement during the Super Bowl for $20 million a minute or a competing product that you heard about through advertising on a shitty forum with 300 active posters for half a penny per click?)

    I get that advertising isn't going away. I get that it's a major industry in this country, and the major driver behind all of our entertainment. I understand that in a global market, even if we banned advertising in our country, it would continue in others. I understand why firms advertise (like I said, it's a prisoner's dilemma.) But if you could reset everything and establish a standard so that mass-advertising was never an option, the money spent on advertising would be instead spent on improving the quality of the products, not the quality of the sales pitch.

  22. #22
    Merry fucking Christmas Atmosfear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    8,675
    Credits
    2,027
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Also as a corollary to my long-run argument, I would also like to recognize that there are certain industries that benefit greatly from advertising because of negative externalities associated with government regulation. The prime example of this is pharmaceuticals, which, by the time their products are approved for the market, often have only 3-6 years to recover billions of dollars of development costs. Advertising costs at that point are not only a small fraction of the costs associated with the product, but may actually lower the overall cost of the product because they can increase the quantity of the product sold to hit the break-even point (if you need to make 50 bucks to break even, you can sell 2 pills for $25 each or you can sell 50 pills for $1 each.)

    Also, I may not have directly highlighted the fact that at the end of the day, it is the consumer who pays for advertising as a result of increased costs associated with the product. If firms weren't paying $20 million for a minute of Super Bowl time, the cost of the product would be $20 million lower, which means the same profit could be achieved at a total price $20 million lower.

  23. #23
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,444
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeah, I'm not reading all that, lol.

    Back on topic, so I wonder how many of these people actually chose the Big Mac and didn't have their video shown by Burger King.

  24. #24
    Senior Member Sion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    404
    Credits
    507
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atmosfear View Post
    well here is another thread derailed.

    First, economically speaking, any argument for advertising tends to be reinforcing the status quo and the impracticality of eliminating it from the market. I understand this, and I understand it will never go away. It's a prisoner's dilemma, so firms have no choice but to advertise because it is possible.

    Second, realize that there are some benefits to advertising that are both more cost-effective and non-unique to mass advertising. Advertising is an effective means of differentiating products and establishing a brand; you know that a bottle with a red label and the white Coca-Cola script is going to taste like coke. Second, advertising is an effective way of conveying facts of the products (again, look on the bottle and know the nutrition facts.) These are important to consumers, but both of these examples were realized without mass advertising. I'm not advocating that every product needs to be devoid of labeling or aesthetic appeal.

    Third, advertising is, by its very nature, either unnecessary for consumers or misleading. Take a hypothetical situation in which there are two vacuum cleaners, A and B. Brand A is top-quality, a great value, and works perfectly. To improve sales, they pour millions of dollars into advertising for their product. Brand B is low-quality, a poor value, and does not work as advertised. To improve sales, they pour millions of dollars into advertising for their product.

    A month later, both products are reporting great sales figures; the advertising is working. Two months later, product A is still going strong and B is leveling off. By the end of three months, product A is established in the marketplace and product B is putting even more money into advertising to help their sales numbers. By the six month period, product A has cut its advertising budget in half and its sales are strong. Product B has disappeared.

    This is exactly as the free market would have the situation play out. The inferior product is gone from the marketplace. However, what about all those consumers who received advertising for B and purchased B, only to wind up with an inferior product? What about all the money that Firm B made on the sales of their inferior product, driven not by the product itself but by good advertising? I would say it's unethical, but I understand why they do it. The free market is still successful, but not because of advertising, rather in spite of advertising.

    Advertising also has a couple of other effects on a product: as my example illustrates, it doesn't really improve sales or profitability for any product in the long-run (in order to continue driving sales numbers, remember, product B had to increase its advertising.) Advertising is, by nature, associated with quality. The logic of the consumer is "if the product wasn't good, the company wouldn't waste the money to advertise." The act of advertising at all is a sign of quality to the consumer (compare: would you be more likely to purchase a product that you first heard about from an advertisement during the Super Bowl for $20 million a minute or a competing product that you heard about through advertising on a shitty forum with 300 active posters for half a penny per click?)

    I get that advertising isn't going away. I get that it's a major industry in this country, and the major driver behind all of our entertainment. I understand that in a global market, even if we banned advertising in our country, it would continue in others. I understand why firms advertise (like I said, it's a prisoner's dilemma.) But if you could reset everything and establish a standard so that mass-advertising was never an option, the money spent on advertising would be instead spent on improving the quality of the products, not the quality of the sales pitch.
    You should write childrens books.

  25. #25
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Atmosfear does make a really valid point; it's pretty sad that people feel it is more important to openly say 'tl;dr' than simply post whatever is applicable to the thread.

    Talking about advertising and it's effects is still central to this thread, considering we are discussing the questionable success of BK vs McD's advertising campaigns.

  26. #26
    mutton mutton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,707
    Credits
    2,641
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    advertising single-handedly ruined stephane dion's reputation in an entire nation

  27. #27
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    well stephane dion had a hand in that, because he never showed that he was a leader

    i mean he still has the two front runners circling him like vultures and hasn't shown control over his party

    and harper is using this as a front to push anti-coalition statements.

    also, touché

  28. #28
    mutton mutton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,707
    Credits
    2,641
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    the way dion beat the others in the leadership race set them up to resist control, and these include people who weren't in the party or even in the country for ever, which are more divisive qualities than a simple french accent

    but i mean once you are the leader of a party why would you need to prove yourself to have leadership traits; it's not all about rallying for support, but articulating policies that others may not agree with

    harper looks like a leader because no one would stand beside him

  29. #29
    A very manly muppet Mad Pino Rage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,863
    Credits
    3,225
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I actually learned something from this thread thanks to Atmosfear's post. The rest of you fine posters are babbling pinheads.
    Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.
    Albert Einstein

  30. #30
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Wow Atmosfear, life is pretty clear cut for you isn't it?

    Anyways,

    I gotta say that BK does have some good food, but they shall never break the stranglehold that Micky D's has on the world.
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  31. #31
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,930
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I was raped by a bic mac so this thread has been very traumatic for me.

  32. #32
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simonj View Post
    I was raped by a bic mac so this thread has been very traumatic for me.
    I have no idea why, but I lol'd pretty hard at this.
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  33. #33
    Band simonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Thicket of Solitude
    Posts
    9,881
    Credits
    1,930
    Trophies
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Did I say big mac? I meant Bernie Mac.

  34. #34
    Sexual Deviant Vengeful Scars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    My Ass
    Posts
    6,588
    Credits
    667
    Trophies
    Blog Entries
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    How do dead people rape?
    lik dis if u cry evertim
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. E View Post
    yes
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    Oh I was expecting a guide to making meth

  35. #35
    Senior Member Killuminati's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,925
    Credits
    359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Pino Rage View Post
    I actually learned something from this thread thanks to Atmosfear's post. The rest of you fine posters are babbling pinheads.

  36. #36
    ))) joke, relax ;) coqauvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    the shwiggity
    Posts
    9,397
    Credits
    1,650
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mutton View Post
    the way dion beat the others in the leadership race set them up to resist control, and these include people who weren't in the party or even in the country for ever, which are more divisive qualities than a simple french accent

    but i mean once you are the leader of a party why would you need to prove yourself to have leadership traits; it's not all about rallying for support, but articulating policies that others may not agree with

    harper looks like a leader because no one would stand beside him
    Once you take control of a political party, you have to have an appearance of being in control. Jean Chretien, for example, had a huge amount of control over his party and was a devious politician - that's why he held a majority government for 13 years, until things finally slipped out of his control (too greedy). No one would accuse Chretien of being a weak leader, because he was a vicious politician and everyone knew it.

    In this case, Dion was handed the leadership because he was the lesser of two evils for both sides, and his inability to project control over his party was, yes, influenced by the two frontrunners not really wanting to be subordinate. Harper seized control of the Conservative party when they merged, and kept it - probably because he is as ruthless as Chretien was back in his heyday. I haven't seen him show any limits when dealing with the public or taking whatever stance absolved his party of responsiblity.

    Harper would look like a real leader if he got a majority government willing to stand behind him. The problem with his heavy-handed manner is that, as a minority government, he requires the help of the other parties to pass any laws. Instead of trying to work with the other parties, and dealing with them diplomatically, he continually alienates himself and his party by forcing motions down all their throats that will cause them harm, backing it up by saying 'If you don't like it, we'll have another election.' He doesn't have the confidence of the House, or of the Canadian people - that doesn't look like a leader to me.

  37. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    701
    Credits
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    i dont know what you guys are talking about but fast food burgers are the best burgers
    fat+grease=delicious
    if you disagree chances are you're just trying to make people on the internet think you're not fat

  38. #38
    Journeyman Cocksmith Mr. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    9,835
    Credits
    1,444
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i dont know what you guys are talking about but fast food burgers are the best burgers
    fat+grease=delicious
    if you disagree chances are you're just trying to make people on the internet think you're not fat
    you are pretty right

  39. #39
    Senior Member Absolution's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,851
    Credits
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i dont know what you guys are talking about but fast food burgers are the best burgers
    fat+grease=delicious
    if you disagree chances are you're just trying to make people on the internet think you're not fat
    mcdonalds is pretty shit

  40. #40
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    delta quadrant
    Posts
    492
    Credits
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I wanna be a bk cherry poppin daddy.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •