Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Yay for USB 3.0

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member wanabedriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    185
    Credits
    890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Nothing short of a RAID will sustain 360 MB/s.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ephekt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    230
    Credits
    224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Pfft, where's my WUSB? I already have eSATA for externals.

    Quote Originally Posted by wanabedriver View Post
    Nothing short of a RAID will sustain 360 MB/s.
    You'll never hit the max theoretical limit anyway. I haven't really kept up with the USB3 spec, but I know USB2 varied greatly due to the controller and having to offload to the CPU - real world speeds were only about ~25MB/s, often far less.
    Last edited by ephekt; 11-13-2008 at 11:50 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member wanabedriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    185
    Credits
    890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ephekt View Post
    Pfft, where's my WUSB? I already have eSATA for externals.
    I haven't heard anything about WUSB. What speeds were people expecting?

    Quote Originally Posted by ephekt View Post
    You'll never hit the max theoretical limit anyway. I haven't really kept up with the USB3 spec, but I know USB2 varied greatly due to the controller and having to offload to the CPU - real world speeds were only about ~25MB/s, often far less.
    Just going off the numbers the article provided from their experiment of copying a 25GB file:
    USB 1.0: 9.3 hours = 0.76 MB/s
    USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes = 30.7 MB/s
    USB 3.0: 70 seconds = 365 MB/s

    IF the technology for 3.0 is similar to 2.0 , and 3.0 is still about 12 times faster than 2.0, I would think 'real' speeds would be 200+ MB/s. Not shabby me thinks.



    ...I'm just salty my PCMCIA eSATA card sucks a nut.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ephekt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    230
    Credits
    224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wanabedriver View Post
    I haven't heard anything about WUSB. What speeds were people expecting?
    From what I've read the intent is to provide USB 2 speeds wirelessly, which would be perfectly fine for most uses. Just think of using your thumb drive without taking it out of your pocket/wallet.


    Just going off the numbers the article provided from their experiment of copying a 25GB file:
    USB 1.0: 9.3 hours = 0.76 MB/s
    USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes = 30.7 MB/s
    USB 3.0: 70 seconds = 365 MB/s

    IF the technology for 3.0 is similar to 2.0 , and 3.0 is still about 12 times faster than 2.0, I would think 'real' speeds would be 200+ MB/s. Not shabby me thinks.
    Oh, I have no doubt that it will be faster than 2.0, I'm just questioning the real world throughput. USB has always done worse than Firewire due to lacking a dedicated controller. I'm just wondering if 3.0 can actually provide a real world throughput in the 200MB/s+ realm.

    As an aside, I'm pretty sure PCMCIA lacks the bandwidth to support SATA speeds. I believe ExpressCard does, though.


    Also, signed on Ethernet's ubiquity. It's an amazing transport technology that is really only now being realized on a large scale. Ethernet is > ATM in many ways. With 10GE and 100GE on the horizon, as well as MPLSoE, I don't really see it going anywhere any time soon.
    Last edited by ephekt; 11-17-2008 at 12:28 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •