Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: I couldnt help myself...

  1. #41
    Senior Member ozzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,758
    Credits
    558
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syme View Post
    I still don't get why people are unnerved by it. I don't see the connection between buying this jokey gun accessory, and being genuinely irresponsible with guns.
    Neither do I, and its annoying how every gun thread needs to turn into a debate on the safety of guns.

  2. #42
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,789
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous D View Post
    Different people have different hobbies. They like different things. Someone said something about show ponies earlier.

    I fucking hate show ponies and think its stupid to parade a big animal about and say "Oh look how purty it is." I have no problem with people showing off a new gun or something for their gun they just got.

    Basically, people that hate on guns will hate on guns, and people that like guns wont give a fuck what they think.
    Show ponies aren't used for killing people.

    This argument isn't about safety, and it isn't about responsibility and it isn't about whether or not guns are bad.

    This argument is about attitude, and it's about an impression that too many gun owners give of being infatuated with their killing things. An impression of "Man, I'm such a cool, badass, righteous dude because I have a firearm."

    Exodite, you said you don't see the connection with gimmicky things like this and general irresponsibility -- there may not be one. Anony seems pretty "responsible". He also, however, seems like a defensive, trigger-happy individual who, if he had carried a gun on certain occasions in his past, would have been responsible for the deaths of several other people (by his own admission). There may not be a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and irresponsibility, but I can definitely see a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and the really disturbing compensatory motives for gun ownership that sole and I have brought up in this thread.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Exodite, you said you don't see the connection with gimmicky things like this and general irresponsibility -- there may not be one. Anony seems pretty "responsible". He also, however, seems like a defensive, trigger-happy individual who, if he had carried a gun on certain occasions in his past, would have been responsible for the deaths of several other people (by his own admission). There may not be a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and irresponsibility, but I can definitely see a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and the really disturbing compensatory motives for gun ownership that sole and I have brought up in this thread.
    I'd agree with this to a limited degree; a person who owns guns to compensate for perceived sexual inadequacy (or any number of other personal confidence problems or what-have-you) might also be the same sort of person who would buy a joke bayonet for their handgun. But I don't think conclusions can or should be drawn in the opposite direction--that a person who buys a joke bayo for their handgun is necessarily compensating for anything, or trying to make themselves into a badass, or something like that. All (or many) people who view guns as prosthetic dicks may be attracted to joke bayos, but not all people who buy joke bayos view their guns as prosthetic dicks.... or something. I don't see any evidence that Anonymous D views his guns as weird sexual compensatory devices, so I still don't get sole's initial comment about this sort of thing making it hard to take gun owners seriously.

    Also, I really don't understand why people are so uncomfortable when a gun owner "shows off" a gun to other gun owners. Yes, of course guns are deadly serious and need to be handled responsibly, and of course they must not be treated like toys. But they are also a hobby; despite the fact that they are lethal weapons, they are also used for hunting and for various forms of recreation, and I don't see anything wrong with one hobbyist showing a piece of new equipment to his fellow hobbyists (especially if it's expensive or well-made or technically sweet or interesting in some other way). To me, that has absolutely nothing to do with treating it like a toy.

  4. #44
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,789
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Just quickly, before I go to bed, I think the reason for this bias about swords and guns is fairly understandable. Today, swords aren't realistically used violently. They're collectables. Decorations. Yes, they are weapons, but almost nobody owns swords for any functional purpose (if they did, the function would be "learning to swordfight" or something, rather than defense). Gun owning, on the other hand, is, in almost all cases, about function. You own a gun so that, if the need arises, you can kill something with it.

    The purpose of swords and guns may be technically identical, but their place in today's world is not at all analogous.

  5. #45
    Senior Member crunker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    162
    Credits
    416
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    You own a gun so that, if the need arises, you can kill something with it.
    I think that's a very hasty generalization. Unless this is a nightstand, carry, or car gun, it's hardly intended for defensive use.

  6. #46
    feel like funkin' it up gwahir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    6,539
    Credits
    2,789
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    It is a generalisation about gun owners. Gun owners (or the ones relevant to this discussion, i.e. not people who just collect guns for display purposes) own guns to kill things with them. I'm not talking about every gun of every gun owner.

    NOW BEDTIME FOR ME.

  7. #47
    FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU Anonymous D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,625
    Credits
    2,706
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    It is a generalisation about gun owners. Gun owners (or the ones relevant to this discussion, i.e. not people who just collect guns for display purposes) own guns to kill things with them. I'm not talking about every gun of every gun owner.
    I dont know a singler person who owns a gun for the reason of killing. I would much prefer to be able to dissuade an attacker by pointing a gun at him instead of shooting him.

    I know you have heard this before, but its very true. Guns dont kill people, people kill people. Like I said earlier, a bullet will not appear in a gun, and it will not go off without someone behind the trigger.

  8. #48
    Senior Member bacon ops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    421
    Credits
    325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwahir View Post
    Show ponies aren't used for killing people.

    This argument isn't about safety, and it isn't about responsibility and it isn't about whether or not guns are bad.

    This argument is about attitude, and it's about an impression that too many gun owners give of being infatuated with their killing things. An impression of "Man, I'm such a cool, badass, righteous dude because I have a firearm."

    Exodite, you said you don't see the connection with gimmicky things like this and general irresponsibility -- there may not be one. Anony seems pretty "responsible". He also, however, seems like a defensive, trigger-happy individual who, if he had carried a gun on certain occasions in his past, would have been responsible for the deaths of several other people (by his own admission). There may not be a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and irresponsibility, but I can definitely see a link between gimmicky additions to pistols and the really disturbing compensatory motives for gun ownership that sole and I have brought up in this thread.

    Didn't he actually save some lives by firing into the air once?

    Yeah, so let's check the score board:


    Anony saves a life with a gun- 1

    Anony scares an emotional australian with words - 1


    Anony commits a violent crime - 0

  9. #49
    FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU Anonymous D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,625
    Credits
    2,706
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Bada bing, bada boom

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    122
    Credits
    325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think it looks awesome, how much did it cost ya annony?
    "Back in the old, dark days of the internet when men were men, women were men, and children were FBI agents, no one cared what people thought of them"

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •