It is an unreasonable expectation, whether you think so or not. It's just not realistic. I can tell that you definitely wish it was realistic--believe me, so do I--but it's not. No one, no matter how competent, can guarantee that they'll never miss. That's just a pipe dream.Originally Posted by faesce
I agree that these things are all good ideas for defending a home, and will prevent more burglaries than a gun in the home ever will. So no your opinion doesn't contradict mine. I'd add that a home-security alarm system, those exterior lights that turn on when they sense motion, and (if practical) a dog with a nice, loud bark are all good security features to have on your house as well, and all are more likely to stop an intruder than a gun is. No-one is denying that the gun is a last resort.Originally Posted by faesce
Prevent the intruder from gaining access but be prepared to react if one does get in and is posing a threat that justifies lethal force. It's not an either/or question. I try not to start fires in my kitchen while cooking, but I do have a fire extinguisher in the house anyway, just in case a fire does start. The fire extinguisher isn't a substitute for safe behavior, and the safe behavior doesn't guarantee that the fire extinguisher will never be needed.





Reply With Quote

Bookmarks