Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
It kind of hangs Auburn and Oklahoma out to dry, since neither of them really have a claim to the BCS NC (Oklahoma lost to USC and Auburn was snubbed from the game, but didn't ever beat Oklahoma.) What do you think is the right way for the BCS to handle this? Should Oklahoma be punished for their loss to a team that has since vacated its victory? Should Auburn be ghosted a win over an otherwise undefeated Oklahoma team? Do the words of Frank Beamer (who played and lost to USC at the beginning of the 2004 season and was spanked by Auburn in the Sugar Bowl at the end) mean anything?

I think the most likely thing is for the BCS to simply vacate the 2004 title and not declare a champion; the AP will probably leave USC with its title (though Auburn was the only other team receiving first place votes.)

What do you think should happen? What do you think will happen?
I think Oklahoma should be punish!