Originally Posted by
MrShrike
Interestingly, I've seen a study (let me look for a link) that points out that the correlation of the Milankovitch cycles to variations in climate show an effect that is always within upper and lower boundaries of the biochemical phase the Earth is within at any given historical period.
So it seems that while the effect of the Milankovitch cycles are certainly there, the magnitude of the effect always acts between limits set by the atmospheric and geologic context of the period being examined. This is consistent with the fact that the Earth's climate has always, at least since life emerged, been actively determined above all by it's biochemical equilibrium.
In other words, change the chemistry of the Earth's biosphere and the biochemical equilibrium will shift along with the range of temperatures experienced. The Milankovitch cycles then tend to act to affect the average temperature within that range, high when the mean orbital radius is low and low when the mean orbital radius is high.
Bookmarks