Thread: Suspect puts drugs in his mouth; cop breaks his neck

Originally Posted by Killuminati

I'm sick of faggots on the internet acting all hardass, especially towards someone they would theoretically look down upon because of some flaw they have(in this case meth addiction). Guess what faggots, people make mistakes and they don't always deserve to die for them.

I'm sick of faggots on the internet who take up for the guy who died because of his own stupidity. He didn't die because he had a small amount of meth on him he died because he didn't cooperate with a police officer and struggled with him instead of doing the thing that any reasonable person does and stay calm so the cop can do his job. Have you ever tried to wrestle with a methhead? It's damn near impossible, putting handcuffs on him during that has to be ten times as difficult. Nobody is saying that he deserved to die because he did meth, fuck I do meth and I don't think that I deserve to die for it. What's being said here is that the guy made a dumb move and ended up losing his life for it. If I climb a power pole and get electrocuted, don't blame the power company because the wire was hot.

Again it's not like the cop blatantly judo-snapped the guys neck, it was an accident. Jesus fucking Christ dude.

Originally Posted by djwolford

What's being said here is that the guy made a dumb move and ended up losing his life for it. If I climb a power pole and get electrocuted, don't blame the power company because the wire was hot.

so you're saying this guy metaphorically climbed a telephone pole and shocked himself by concealing a bag of drugs from an officer?

Originally Posted by djwolford

Again it's not like the cop blatantly judo-snapped the guys neck, it was an accident. Jesus fucking Christ dude.

dunno where you live but in the united states people who cause accidents that take another person's life by using bad/malicious judgment are prosecuted as though the accident was premeditated. there's a LOT of lee-way in what a cop can do if he thought his life was in danger, and it all holds up in court, but the problem lies in that this officers life was not in danger and he had absolutely zero justification in doing what he did.

are you familiar with how bounty hunters that work for bail bondsman operate? if one of those guys (a regular joe in the government's eyes) choked a guy to death in a struggle by accident that was due to bad judgment, the ONLY reason they wouldn't get prosecuted is because they have a statement signed by you saying that if you flee, they're allowed to use lethal force to restrain you and return you to police custody.

officers don't have a statement signed by you forfeiting your rights, and this particular cop's life was most certainly NOT in danger, so why do you feel as though this is just some accident we should sweep under the carpet? and for that matter, doesn't it bother you that we don't prosecute people who commit crimes (in the law's eye) because they're police officers?