Thread: DISCORSO MAFIOSO

So, to those suspicious of me: yes I've been very loud and brash, yes I've been PMing people to alter the vote, but consider in what way. I did not see substantial evidence to suggest bfdirty was a mobster, therefore I tried to weaken the vote to kill someone I saw as being a villager. I made bfdirty rescind his vote in favour of sailor jack and repeatedly stood against unreasonable attacks on sailor jack (consider that in light of what we now know).
I helped to mobilise a vote against KT. when the evidence seemed to point in that direction, and then, after long discussion both in thread and via PM, having come to the conclusion that she may not be a werewolf (that it was no longer reasonable suspicion, not that she is in the clear), I ensured a three-way tie by insisting KT and bfdirty vote with me against mutton. In the process I could examine both KT's and bfdirty's reasoning and co-operation, both of which seemed sufficient to suggest that they may be villagers. I PMed Infernus and tried to get him to change his vote from bfdirty to KT to again avoid a bfdirty killing majority. Here you can see that I didn't simply decide to switch from KT to Mutton and that I genuinely wanted to avoid a lynching. I also PMed Mutton in an effort to ensure that he didn't feel the battle lines descending between the bloc I'd formed and him, and that at least I could act as intermediary.
I shan't pretend that I have wholly ceased to suspect either KT or Mutton, or pretend that if one of them had been killed rather than bfdirty I wouldn't have considered that I had substantially increased our chances of killing a werewolf. What I will say is that whilst it may be natural for the three of us (loud and brash as we are) to each suspect the others, the rest of you ought to be quite careful about suspecting all three of us; if even just one of us is a villager, they are the most committed villager in the game so far. I suspect that at least two of us are villagers. One of them is me. Obviously.
You may think it an act of sabotage merely to have prevented a lynching yesterday. I answer: we had no candidate upon whom reasonable suspicion could be placed, and whilst the likelihood of killing a mafioso during the day is obviously higher than during the night, that means naught unless we do actually choose a mafioso. You may doubt my reasoning, but not, I think, my intentions.