Thread: Zombieland

Originally Posted by MalReynolds

Why compare the two?

One is about surviving the beginning of a zombie outbreak.

One is about the aftermath.

The objectives of the movies are entirely different. It's like comparing Platoon with Gettysburg. Both are war movies, but comparing them is foolish as they're going for different things.

This is an excellent point, and fuck anyone who disagrees

Originally Posted by MalReynolds

I mean, in that regard, I should hold Mortal Kombat and Silent Hill to the same standard, because they're both based off a video game - despite one of the movies being shit and the other being art. Platoon was good, but Gettysburg had better speeches. They're both war movies. Night of the Living Dead wasn't as good as Shaun of the Dead, but Night sure was scarier.

I think, on the surface, a base comparison can be made, but any deeper analysis would be doing a disservice to both movies.

Lol Neither one of those movies were very good

Originally Posted by Atmosfear

Guess what mal you can compare two movies that both try to be funny

You can, but his point still remains the same. It's almost apples and oranges.

Originally Posted by TheDudeFish

emma stone is hawt.

THIS