Hopefully my team wins..
Teams of 3.. first team to:
-Drink a case (30)
-Smoke an 8th
-Eat a pizza
WINS!!
I'm gonna dominate tonight! (I hope)
Printable View
Hopefully my team wins..
Teams of 3.. first team to:
-Drink a case (30)
-Smoke an 8th
-Eat a pizza
WINS!!
I'm gonna dominate tonight! (I hope)
What do you win?
I liked this thread better the first time when it was more extreme and that other guy made it.
You would sound so much cooler if you would have used the words "30 rack" and "fire bud" in there somewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
Yeah and even then it was pretty ordinary.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. E
yeah atmosfear thinks fire bud is hip cool drug slang terminologyQuote:
Originally Posted by djwolford
30 rack is just retarded, there is no reason to deviate from the normal word that everyone else says
and yeah what evolved said
You'd be more of a man if you did an actual triathalon.
Agreed. I did a team tri once. I was the bike. We did alright.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepsi
I have never heard of team triathlon. I've run a few triathlons in my day though. And by a few I mean 2.
That's a couple. :) Few has to be three or more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. E
Not really, but oh well.
Strong contradiction is contradictory.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. E
I haven't done this yet, but ironically I have done 8 real triathlons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. E
you see, last year, this was basically a slow friday. we'd sit around drinking smoking and eating pizza. this is not a competition
of course, then i turned into a teetotaler, but whatever
A team of 3 has to do that? it should be a single person that has to. That's a real triathlon. 2 people could kill a rack, an eighth is easy by any means. The pizza is the only hard part after drinking the rack.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
I call pussies at your college.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
A diagnosis of liver failure or lung cancer by the time he turns 40Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
You're eight times a man. :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoXRider31
a severe case of life-destroying alcohol dependency, an inability to concentrate, black lungs, a marked lack of ambition or drive and an extra 50 lbs. or so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
Oh weed gives you lung cancer now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0123104017.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by Killuminati
Yes some stupid report says that Marijuana may not cause lung cancer, but with the destruction of the lungs comes an increased risk of lung cancer :rolleyes:
Cannabis and cancer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
Large Study Finds No Link between Marijuana and Lung Cancer
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...5F83414B7F0000
Study finds no marijuana link to lung cancer http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/ma...k_lung_cancer/
Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052501729.html
Cannabis and tobacco smoke are not equally carcinogenic. “A connection between marijuana smoking and lung or colorectal cancer was not observed”
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/2/1/21
Cannabis smoke less carcinogenic than carcinogenic smoke
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/32229.php
Cannabis study finds less cancer risk than tobacco http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/oc...alcohol.health
Marijuana Unlikely to Cause Head, Neck, or Lung Cancer
http://www.webmd.com/news/20000508/m...o-cause-cancer
Smoking Marijuana Does Not Cause Cancer According to a Case-control Study http://bbsnews.net/article.php/20050710150925597
Cannabis and brain damage.
Heavy Marijuana Use Doesn’t Damage Brain
http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/n...t-damage-brain
Marijuana Boosts Brain Cell Growth http://www.aphroditewomenshealth.com...lth_news.shtml
Marijuana might cause new cell growth in the brain
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn8155
High Times for Brain Growth: Marijuana-like drug multiplies neurons
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20051015/fob7.asp
“studies using DTI have not found any abnormalities whatsoever in any part of the brains of adolescent heavy cannabis users. In fact, if anything, adolescent cannabis users tended to have larger brains, with more cells (white matter) than the controls. That doesn’t mean that using cannabis in adolescence makes you smart, but it surely rules out significant global brain damage.”
http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/...1/17/lIDABD3EJ
“Smoking marijuana does not have a long-term effect on intelligence. Only the heavy current users had experienced a decline in their IQ scores over the 10-year period - about four points, But people who had once smoked heavily and then given up were right back up to normal. Light users, former users and abstainers all saw their IQ scores climb between two and six points.”
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2140
Study: Alcohol, Tobacco Worse Than Pot
http://cbs3.com/topstories/alcohol.t....2.282305.html
suck on that.
guys babar ended up in the hospital last night and they couldn't get him to start breathing again, I just got off the phone with his mom
this fucking sucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killuminati
Learn to read what is posted you enormous moronQuote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
seriously?Quote:
Originally Posted by jared
How would that not look like internet sarcasm to me. You said it was some stupid report and linked to it after saying weed causes cancer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
edit: also why would you quote that entire post for no reason.
yeah dudeQuote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
I love you. So much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Killuminati
Seriously. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
You never read the link I posted to begin with. You just automatically assumed that I was saying that marijuana causes lung cancer, while I was basically implying that it is an indirect cause of lung cancer. You failed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Killuminati
And I honestly had no idea what babar was saying in his original post. Unlike you, I am not a marijuana smoker, I don't know any, I never learned what the hell an "8th" is, so I automatically thought he was referring to smoking in general. I'm not sorry that I have too much going to waste my free time "chilling" and smoking a blunt. I actually care about my lungs in general and refuse to partake in smoking of anything. I actually like to be able to breathe.
Seriously :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
I did read the link you posted. Had you taken the time to read all of the links I posted (don't worry I never expected you to look at any of them) you would read that other studies had evidence that showed that even with holding the hits in longer there was still no link between marijuana smoking and cancer. Also plenty of successful people smoke every day so just because you smoke doesn't mean you just sit around all day. There is lung damage caused by smoking weed but if you maintain an active lifestyle you wouldn't even notice adverse effects on your lungs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
As opposed to wasting time reading comic books and posting on an internet forum? Yeah, that's a hell of a lot more productive. I hope one day I can have that much going for me in my life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
ITT: inhaling particles of ash and holding them in your lungs causes absolutely no damage to them, even if said activity is long-term.
In conclusion smoke out of a vaporizer (and pvam is an idiot).
Hey Kal El, smoke a blunt and see if it doesn't change your perspective on what's important in your life.
Shut up babar you cunt.
You imply that that would be benefical.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
Babar, start shooting heroin and see if it doesn't change your perspective on what's important in your life.
Heroin is alot different than weed, noob.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWhUqo9Aivs
Lol katt williams.
Wow, it's a good thing you pointed that out, because I had no clue!Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
The point is drug use changes your perception and priorities, and to say or imply that it's better to be on drugs is pretty stupid.
I was saying he should try it before he knocks it, and that only happens if you become a pothead and smoke all the time. Most people I know just smoke once in a while. I wasn't telling him to become a stoner.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
I hate babar.
Lol, I knew that was coming.
Babar, I am just saying you should try heroin before you knock it, and that only happens if you become a junkie and shoot up all the time. Most people I know just shoot up once in a while. I'm not telling you to become a junkie.
What does the angry masterbation fit in?
Well I don't know anyone that does heroin, besides this one guy who got kicked outta school because he was addicted to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
So I see all these reports about it not causing cancer. That doesn’t mean that it’s good for you ignoramuses. It still causes emphysema and other lovely things. Potheads are about as funny sometimes as black history month.
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabi...is_myth4.shtmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
"Frequent marijuana smokers experience adverse respiratory symptoms from smoking, including chronic cough, chronic phlegm, and wheezing. However, the only prospective clinical study shows no increased risk of crippling pulmonary disease (chronic bronchitis and emphysema)."
Where do you get your information from or do you just assume things. Also no one said it was good for you to smoke it. That does not mean however that marijuana is not good for you because ingesting it in other ways can be extremely beneficial.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
click the link before posting it
Also if you honestly believe an article that says a joint is as bad as 5 cigarettes you don't deserve to have an opinion on marijuana.
Christ you potheads are picky.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNew...73105820070731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killuminati
This would be better if you did an 8-ball of blow and fucked bitches
I'm sorry. I was wrong. It's good for your lungs. Smoke more.
That article is inaccurate because you don't usually smoke 1 gram of weed (average size of a cigarette) in a joint to yourself opposed to a cigarette where you smoke it all to yourself.
I did have a life changing even that changed my perspective on life. It was called a near death experience. I'm just not feeling the vibe you get when you want to smoke a blunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
I don't read comic books. I admit posting on this forum isn't very productive. My "high" comes from working out at the gym, not from inhaling stuff and getting high. I'm just sorry, the head injury I had from my accident makes stupid enough as it is, I don't need to get high or drunk or end up doing something very stupid and dangerous because i'm not myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy
you see i know people who smoke more than a gram to themselves. if you go through, say, even a quarter ounce in a day, it's just as bad if you smoke it all in little pinners or if you roll up seven joints with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
That's not even the reason this study was fucked. Smoke as much as you want you aren't getting cancer or emphysema.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
Okay fine, here is more scientific data.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQEi_Ez_vnw
"However, the only prospective clinical study shows no increased risk of crippling pulmonary disease (chronic bronchitis and emphysema)."
Does not translate into
"Smoke as much as you want you aren't getting cancer or emphysema."
I have a hard time understanding why you think inhaling smoke and holding it in won't negatively affect your lungs.
coqauvin, I apologize for being a douche to you in the past
You are now on my hero list
I can do that to
http://www.abovetheinfluence.com/
That is every bit as much propaganda as the government sites. Some fact, mostly rosy colored glasses.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
FYI I don't mind people smoking pot, I just find most post smokers annoying idiots.
How do I smoke post?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
I don't see the need for this website, weed isn't that magnificent.Quote:
Originally Posted by babar
biff pretty much already said it
both kal el and babar just linked to propaganda sites. I'm sure there is valuable information in there, but the fact that it's there is useless when you realize that you have to wade through a ton of bullshit to find it.
link me to a neutral, third-party site that isn't a news article and maybe i'll believe your shit.
What about the list of sites I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
Ok, the vast majority of your articles linked are not good sources of information. When we are talking about events, then newspapers and journals are an acceptable source to use, but the tendency for the media to sensationalize the most trivial scientific discovery renders them a bad source, because then the actual discovery and report itself are filtered again with the bias in mind to exagerrate portions that the author believes will attract moer readers. Science journals may be bland, but they are your only real reliable source for studies on this matter.
In the area about lung cancer, the only source you used that was valid was WebMD, but a search on the first two pages of WebMD for marijuana yielded:
mj and infertility - http://www.webmd.com/infertility-and...acco-marijuana
and keep in mind this is from a study done in 2007, not 2000 like the article you quoted in your post. SourceQuote:
Originally Posted by webmd
And that Marijuana usage shrinks the brain. http://www.webmd.com/brain/news/2008...rink-the-brain 2008
For the brain section, you listed:
But in reading this article, it's found that what started the cell development in rats was a sythentic combound in the cannabinoid family. When the experiment was repeated using a natural THC extract, no new cell growth was discovered.Quote:
This is exactly the same as the last article i mentioned. Did you even read these before posting them?Quote:
High Times for Brain Growth: Marijuana-like drug multiplies neurons
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20051015/fob7.asp
this article was written in 2003, and shows no label of being reviewed. The article I linked to about brain shrinkage was released in 2008 and has been peer reviewed.Quote:
This was probably the best source you used in all your links. The thing to keep in mind, though, is that they used a really limited about of test subjects (ten and ten controls), and the test relied on subject honesty. The data itself is not conclusive, although it indicates a direction further studies should go down. In the journals own words:
Strictly speaking, in adolescents there is little evidence one way or the other that weed will distort their brain, but there are established links between marijuana and schizophrenia and psychosis, where weed is not strictly the cause, but tends to exacerbate symptoms.Quote:
Originally Posted by harm reduction journal
keep in mind that the IQ gains could easily be making up for lost ground, and your implication that marijuana allowed for the IQ gain is juvenile and false. There are many reasons IQs could rise, and smoking pot is one of the least likelyQuote:
Originally Posted by you
And the very next line after your quote is:
In conclusion, pvam is an idiotQuote:
Originally Posted by your source
In summation, your links provided little useful information, and the vast majority of it is easily refutable with a marginally more comprehensive look into the subject. Next time, I suggest reading the articles you link to and seeing whether or not they really help your case. Avoid using media as a source for scientific news, because it's main tendency is towards sensationalism, and finally, stop smoking weed.
I don't agree with the part about schizophrenia and psychosis because quite a few people take up smoking so they are baked and don't have to deal with reality. I'd argue, without any evidence, that these conditions were already present.Quote:
Originally Posted by coqauvin
I also don't agree with the stop smoking weed part. Just don't post about it every time you get high and don't think your support of medical pot fools anyone.
both the links iin question state that weed doesn't cause these things, but if you are predisposed towards them, it makes the symptoms worse. For some, it can be the proverbial snowflake, and for others it's simply another factor that keeps the psychosis going strong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
So, yes, the conditions were always present. I never said they weren't.
I have the sound muted, and I can only guess two things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Bifford
1. This person's friend(s) deliberately procured and fitted the bowl with bad marijuana without his consent.
2. This guy is a noob.
I am going to take a stab at this and say two is the most probable cause.
itt people get uppity about things that are personal choices and don't really matter either way
well i mean heroin is a personal choice and it doesn't really matter either wayQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr. E
christ i have to stop taking this stance
so i take this to mean that babar lost the triathlon
and/or died...because he tried to septuple it.Quote:
Originally Posted by mutton
Dude, put me on your team... i could smoke an eighth in like 15 minutes.
lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal El
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by abovetheinfluence
I do all of those, apart from driving while high/drunk.
I can't drive.
Maybe someone should talk to me lol.
I've done all of those as well. I wonder if I should get help.
* Needs drugs or alcohol to ... cope with everyday life.
this is the only real point of concern on that list, but really how would you ever find that out?
You must immerse yourself in the drug culture in order to get to the bottom of this matter.
You can identify a dope fiend by the white from inner tension and that his pants will be crusted with semen from constantly jacking off when he can't find a rape victim.