Milk them tits and make ice cream.

PETA wackos want Ben & Jerry to make ice cream using human breast milk

http://www.wnbc.com/news/17539627/detail.html

I wonder what new flavors they would cum up with.

I'm down.......who's breasts though?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djwolford

I'm down.......who's breasts though?

---

fubarbabees

I don't think semen would make a good ice-cream-like substitute, and it would be difficult to collect it in large quantities.

Not to mention the possible transmission of STDs etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sycld

I don't think semen would make a good ice-cream-like substitute, and it would be difficult to collect it in large quantities.

Not to mention the possible transmission of STDs etc.

---

Who's talking semen? This is ludicrous, how how they ever get ENOUGH milk to make it all, they would have to hire these women, try to force them to produce a mass amount of milk, which would lower her and her child's quality of life. It makes me sick that peta values the life of a cow over a human, we are the same species damn it! If you have to choose between your own species health and another species health, you choose your own.

Sycld has a point about STD's, plus it is generally unsettling for an human adult to drink human breast milk. This is illogical.

You can't get STDs through breast milk, stud.

I'm willing to slightly nibble on any child-bearing breasts put in front of me if need be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sycld

You can't get STDs through breast milk, stud.

---

Meh... details. What about aids, if someone has full blown aids would that not be in that bodily fluid? I am asking, not trying to make a point

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sycld

You can't get STDs through breast milk, stud.

---

Not STDs generally speaking, but you can get HIV through breast milk.

I'm pretty sure that hiv and syphilis can be shared with your young'n through the wonders of breast feeding.

Lets tie down the PETA bitches and milk them dry daily and then feed them the ice cream. Broadcast that shit on the web and charge for access to live feed if ya short on fundings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sycld

I don't think semen would make a good ice-cream-like substitute, and it would be difficult to collect it in large quantities.

Not to mention the possible transmission of STDs etc.

---

It'll be the yogurt of breast milk ice cream.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gorefinger

Not STDs generally speaking, but you can get HIV through breast milk.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by djwolford

I'm pretty sure that hiv and syphilis can be shared with your young'n through the wonders of breast feeding.

---

Well in the future I'll abstain from HIV and syphilis tainted breast milk thanks.

But pasteurization will kill 'em sooooo there.

I learned that lesson the hard way.

I got a girl pregnant, and read it on the wall of a gynecologist's waiting room.

haha

Breast milk is tasty. A bit sweet, but goes well in my morning coffee.

oh god everything is a moron

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrShrike

Breast milk is tasty. A bit sweet, but goes well in my morning coffee.

---

Tastes pretty good/weird imo furreal pets though.

I mean weird as in wtf man? and good as in I wouldn't want a glass of it.


Semen is also one of them oddities.

I prefer the term nipple-jizz myself.

I'd be lying if I said I never sucked milk out of a big fat pregnant tittie.


Meh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrTroy

Who's talking semen? This is ludicrous, how how they ever get ENOUGH milk to make it all, they would have to hire these women, try to force them to produce a mass amount of milk, which would lower her and her child's quality of life. It makes me sick that peta values the life of a cow over a human, we are the same species damn it! If you have to choose between your own species health and another species health, you choose your own.

Sycld has a point about STD's, plus it is generally unsettling for an human adult to drink human breast milk. This is illogical.

---

I think you're taking this a bit too seriously. I'm pretty sure Peta didn't think that B&J's would really go for it, or work out the logistics. From what I understand, the taste of human milk is strongly influenced by the diet of the mother, and never really tastes good.

However, I've met a lot of people and a few cows, and I'm not sure I like people better. And think of all the single mothers you could put to work this way. Once their own spawn is/are weaned, they can just keep getting milked for money. Easy, part-time work, and it helps keep them off of welfare. They just need to keep a diet that keeps their milk tasty (or as tasty as possible).

Oh, and if it's unsettling to drink human breast milk, why, exactly, is it not unsettling to drink COW BREAST MILK? You're too old for it, AND it's the wrong species. It's like saying that it's wrong to be a pedophile, but okay to fuck kittens.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sasquash

I think you're taking this a bit too seriously. I'm pretty sure Peta didn't think that B&J's would really go for it, or work out the logistics. From what I understand, the taste of human milk is strongly influenced by the diet of the mother, and never really tastes good.

However, I've met a lot of people and a few cows, and I'm not sure I like people better. And think of all the single mothers you could put to work this way. Once their own spawn is/are weaned, they can just keep getting milked for money. Easy, part-time work, and it helps keep them off of welfare. They just need to keep a diet that keeps their milk tasty (or as tasty as possible).

Oh, and if it's unsettling to drink human breast milk, why, exactly, is it not unsettling to drink COW BREAST MILK? You're too old for it, AND it's the wrong species. It's like saying that it's wrong to be a pedophile, but okay to fuck kittens.

---

Lol, not quite the same, if its from your own species, it just seems weird, if it is from another species, it is a food source just like any other.

okay to fuck kittens

god

damn

PETA can go fuck themselves tbh.
One, or a few flavours using human milk would be fine? But to totally replace cow milk with human milk in their products?
Get fucked.

...because they wanted people to do exactly this.

i agree with sasquash let's all fuck some cats

They don't realize that getting its tits squeezed every once in awhile is probably the only enjoyable thing a cow has in its otherwise mundane, banal life.

Okay just to explain since it seems some people posting here don't understand what the PETA people are saying.

They post some ridiculous stuff hoping people will make a big deal out of how wrong and retarded it is for us to milk humans for human consumption. Then it's "AHHA!! Then it's wrong and retarded to milk cows!! How would you feel if you were a cow?!"

People
Eating
Tasty
Animals

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atomic

Okay just to explain since it seems some people posting here don't understand what the PETA people are saying.

They post some ridiculous stuff hoping people will make a big deal out of how wrong and retarded it is for us to milk humans for human consumption. Then it's "AHHA!! Then it's wrong and retarded to milk cows!! How would you feel if you were a cow?!"

People
Eating
Tasty
Animals

---

I can see that, but there is a big flaw, Cows are not sentient self-aware beings.

Well I know that, but the peta people are retarded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrTroy

I can see that, but there is a big flaw, Cows are not sentient self-aware beings.

---

What? How do you define sentient and self-aware? And why does that matter? If it's cruel, it's cruel. If it's not, it's not. The IQ of the animal attached to the udders isn't too relevant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sasquash

What? How do you define sentient and self-aware? And why does that matter? If it's cruel, it's cruel. If it's not, it's not. The IQ of the animal attached to the udders isn't too relevant.

---

I do not define sentient and self-aware, those definitions have already been laid out and cows do not meet the criteria. Cruel is an opinion, and milking cows in my opinion is not cruel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrTroy

I do not define sentient and self-aware, those definitions have already been laid out and cows do not meet the criteria.

---

Well, what are the definitions, and who decided on them? Are they universally accepted? And again, what difference does it make whether or not they're sentient and self-aware?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrTroy

Cruel is an opinion, and milking cows in my opinion is not cruel.

---

I'm guessing that their point is that an animal living its entire life in captivity just to service the dairy industry, and being killed as soon as its production goes down is what is cruel. Or maybe they feel that the milking process itself is not as humane as it could or should be.