For those of you who have seen the movie or have suffered through the book (fantastic read, but you must admit that all the slang became a headache quickly), it raises a few interesting questions but there is only one I want to focus on.

Is it better to be forced to be good, or to be yourself and accept that you might do evil?

Now I've debated this several times in person and I was quite shocked to find that most agreed it was best to be forced to do good instead of risk evil. In my personal opinion if one was forced to be good, it would violate their free agency and strip them of their own will and therefore make them less of a human being.

Sorry for this being short and hopefully to the point, but what do you fine folks think?