I didn't say anything about it making the world better, in my opinion in nature, there are no rights of any kind, we as human beings made up "rights". Why wouldn't I have the right to that which is immoral?

The right thing to do and what I have the right to do are two very different things. In my mind, moral/ethical "rights" are as far away as possible from what people have the "legal right" to do, black and white. Now when it comes to legal man-made law, if doing the ethical or moral "right" thing were a part of every single law, where it is illegal to do anything rather than moral choices, we get into a situation where we ask "who decides what is moral?", what if someone viewed it as immoral not to donate every dollar of free money that you had to charity, it is immoral not to donate to charity, therefore the only right you have is to donate to charity?

In the middle east it is perfectly fine to cut off someones hands for stealing, I view that as far too harsh a punishment, morality is a sliding scale. So my position is on natural rights: We have none, human morality that has developed with our cognitive abilities doesn't mean there are any rights present of any kind. And on legal rights: Clearly there are laws based on what the majority view as immoral (theft, murder etc...), which allow us to live in a relatively civilized manner.