Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: The Electoral College

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by no_brains_no_worries View Post
    What would we use to replace this system though? We can't determine the next leader of the free world through the popular vote because they are so easily tampered with.
    What do you mean?

  2. #2
    Take orally. no_brains_no_worries's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,770
    Credits
    211
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syme View Post
    What do you mean?
    http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/se...vote-s14.shtml

    http://www.correntewire.com/guarante...tory_this_year

    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...lection_stolen

    Take these stories for what you think they are worth and even if they aren't true, the possibility of tampering is out there. Also, now that most states have begun moving to electronic voting machines, the fear that someone (not the "inside man" for a political party which I'm sure every conspiracy buff is suspecting) would have the know-how or means to tamper with the votes.

    I mean if Kevin Mitnick could wiretap the FBI (allegedly) what could someone like that do to voting machines guarded by senior volunteers?
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzy View Post
    He came to the states for his birthday and now he's going home in a body bag. That's what you get for sending your child to Utah.
    Quote Originally Posted by raghead View Post
    i would have whipped out my dick in that situation
    Quote Originally Posted by KT. View Post
    News flash, guys can't get pregnant from vaginal sex either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Atmoscheer View Post
    But what is their policy on winning the hearts and minds through forcible vaginal entry?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Syme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    769
    Credits
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by no_brains_no_worries View Post
    http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/se...vote-s14.shtml

    http://www.correntewire.com/guarante...tory_this_year

    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...lection_stolen

    Take these stories for what you think they are worth and even if they aren't true, the possibility of tampering is out there. Also, now that most states have begun moving to electronic voting machines, the fear that someone (not the "inside man" for a political party which I'm sure every conspiracy buff is suspecting) would have the know-how or means to tamper with the votes.

    I mean if Kevin Mitnick could wiretap the FBI (allegedly) what could someone like that do to voting machines guarded by senior volunteers?
    Uh, how is tampering with voting machines easier, or more of a concern, when the president is directly elected than when we have the electoral college? It strikes me as an equally serious concern either way. Obviously the possibility of tampering is out there, but going to a direct-election system doesn't make it any more severe.

Similar Threads

  1. College relationship
    By Anonymous in forum Personal Support
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-30-2008, 12:45 PM
  2. College football, who do you like?
    By llFidoll in forum The Sport Report
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-01-2008, 08:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •