Feel bad for posting this, but... US Islamic TV founder charged with beheading wife

**bacon ops** · 02-22-2009, 08:44 PM

Originally Posted by no_brains_no_worries

Seriously. You fucking stab me in the knee cap or blow torch my balls, I'm gonna tell you whatever you fuckin' want to hear, even if it's a pack of lies.

yeah, because they don't check if information collaborates with related intelligence before going with it.

I hate ur gutz

**no_brains_no_worries** · 02-26-2009, 09:28 PM

Originally Posted by bacon ops

yeah, because they don't check if information collaborates with related intelligence before going with it.

I hate ur gutz

Yeah all information checks out. I mean Sadam had LOADS of yellow cake. That bastard. I mean, he was the strongest link to radical terrorism in the middle east!

/sarcasm.

**sycld** · 02-26-2009, 09:54 PM

Originally Posted by bacon ops

yeah, because they don't check if information collaborates with related intelligence before going with it.

I hate ur gutz

if they have time "to see if the information checks out," then obviously we're not in a hypothetical "time of crisis" when we have to resort to torture to quickly obtain information. that's what the pro-torture people claim, that if there's an emergency and we need information quickly we should be able to torture, even though there's plenty of evidence to show that information obtained from torture is unreliable. then again, these same people's view of reality isn't constrained by "facts" and "evidence."

**simonj** · 02-26-2009, 10:15 PM

Originally Posted by sycld

if they have time "to see if the information checks out," then obviously we're not in a hypothetical "time of crisis" when we have to resort to torture to quickly obtain information. that's what the pro-torture people claim, that if there's an emergency and we need information quickly we should be able to torture, even though there's plenty of evidence to show that information obtained from torture is unreliable. then again, these same people's view of reality isn't constrained by "facts" and "evidence."

Best right-wing response to a left-wing diatribe on morality concerning homosexuality I've ever heard was "yeah, well you can prove anything with facts.".

**Pepsi** · 02-26-2009, 10:19 PM

Originally Posted by simonj

Best right-wing response to a left-wing diatribe on morality concerning homosexuality I've ever heard was "yeah, well you can prove anything with facts.".

Did dubya say that?