whatever
regardless of the details, there's a marked difference in wisdom with every year that goes past, generally speaking, and 3 years is enough to yield a world of difference
whatever
regardless of the details, there's a marked difference in wisdom with every year that goes past, generally speaking, and 3 years is enough to yield a world of difference
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAI, as a 17 year old, seem to have more wisdom then anyone in the Goddamn country that identifies themselves as either Republican or Democrat.
So answer to the question that motivated this thread is:
It's an appropriate first post if you want people to ride your ass like they're lifers in a penitentiary and you're the thin new 20 year old arrival with soft skin and full lips.
Sycld is actually an idiot
When sycld farts it smells like semen.
Hey-o.
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." -Anne Frank
“We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.” -Buddha
Identity
Inc furious homo rage.
See now I thought I was the only one that noticed.
The Cleveland show is quite mediocre!
um excuse me but taking it up the ass is common saying on the internets and elsewhere for when one is foiled, defeated, opposed, etc. in a particularly spectacular way
i'm not saying i don't have a fixation but sometimes it's not all about that
also nou atmos
Real Books Are Great For The Mind And Soul
hey they just want to tell a story, warhawk, it's not their fault they're bad at it and it's a shitty story
well i used to think it was good and then puberty hit
ps literature is where it is at my friends
well ok then we have to have the conversation on what is considered literature
if it was written before 1950 and it is considered literature by most it is probably very good
if it was written past 2000 and is considered literature by most there is a huge possibility that it is one of the following:
1. hipster experimental shit
2. a story set in a war-torn foreign country during the 20th century following a family and their troubles
at least one of those sweep generalizations must be correct
oh
wait
well if you made a statement with a sweeping generalization and then made its negative you'd think that one of them would have to be true, but goedel found out that because all formal systems are incomplete this need not be the case
/goedel'd
yes we all know this sans the pomposity
no generalization is true
eh the statement gets the point across without the needless specifications
maybe you do need pomposity
so i just wanted to drop by and comment on how gay the lot of you are
Bookmarks